Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载

Filter by Type:

Results 41 - 50 of 2888 for 制暴无限杀机 下载
News of Note post
Duhamel did not employ any system or strategy to manage or mitigate the risks associated with his poker business. Mr. ... Duhamel does not employ any method of gathering information about his gambling opponents. Mr. ... The Queen, 2022 CCI 66 under s. 3(a) business source. ...
News of Note post
11 November 2020- 11:18pm Yellow Point Federal Court of Appeal confirms that an ecological gift was made in the year before it was certified as such Email this Content A taxpayer, who donated an interest in ecologically sensitive land to two qualified donees in 2008, unsuccessfully argued that the gift was not made until 2009 for purposes of computing the five-year (now 10-year) carryforward period described in s. 110.1(1)(d)(iii), because it was not until 2009 that he received the certification from the Minister of the Environment as to the land's ecologically sensitive nature and value that was required under that provision. In confirming that the ecological gift instead was made in 2008 when the gifted property was transferred, Noël CJ stated: [W]hen property is gifted the disposition takes place when ownership of the gifted property is transferred from the donor to the donee There is no doubt that the appellant’s entitlement to the capital gain exemption and the related deduction did not arise until 2009 when all the conditions set out in paragraph 110.1(1)(d) and subsection 110.1(2) were met, but this does not alter the time when the “gift was made”. Noël CJ also effectively found that the word “peut” (may) in the French version of s. 118.1(11) meant the same thing as the word “shall” in the English version, stating in this regard: [T]he use of the word “peut” in the French version illustrates how “an official who is permitted to do a thing may, in addition, be obliged to do it” (Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes …). ...
News of Note post
The relevant QSTA provisions, which were broadly similar in this regard to ETA ss. 225(1) A(a), 228(2) and 222(1), required that a person receiving payment of a policy premium collect the tax thereon as agent for the Minister and remit such tax to the Minister. ... In going on to confirm the imposition of penalties on the taxpayers pursuant to the Tax Administration Act (generally calculated as 15% of the amounts they had remitted one month late), the Court stated: The defence of due diligence allows for the avoidance of administrative penalties imposed by a statute where an error of fact is made in good faith, but not where there is an error of law. To allow the taxpayer to escape the consequences of failing to meet its obligations by proposing a different interpretation of the legislative provisions would open a loophole that is difficult to reconcile with [the self-assessment] principle. ... Assurances générales Desjardins Inc., 2022 QCCA 57 under ETA s. 225(1) A(a) and ITA s. 227(8)(a). ...
News of Note post
28 March 2022- 11:45pm Shaker Federal Court finds that a trustee of a real estate trust does not hold any “interest in real property” that can be charged by CRA Email this Content CRA obtained an interim order to charge the interest of Mr. ... Shaker’s legal interest in the Blue Jays Way property as trustee, and before ordering the interim charge to be discharged, Walker J stated: Trust property is not available to the creditors of a trustee where the debt in question is the trustee’s personal debt …. ... To conclude otherwise would improperly and adversely impact the interests of the third-party beneficiaries of the VSI Trust. Canada North Group stat[ed] “[p]roperty held in trust cannot be said to belong to the trustee because ‘in equity, it belongs to another person’ (Henfrey [[1989] 2 S.C.R. 24]], at p. 31)”. ...
News of Note post
29 September 2016- 9:25pm Chriss Federal Court of Appeal finds that a written resignation must be signed and delivered to the corporation to start the two-year s. 227.1(4) period running Email this Content The husband of a director had instructed their law firm to prepare a written resignation for her, which they did, but the resignation form was never provided to her. In reversing a finding of Boyle J that this was sufficient to amount to a written resignation that started the two-year limitation period in s. 227.1(4) running, Rennie JA stated: …In the absence of the communication of a written resignation to the corporation, a resignation is not effective. Reliance on the subjective intention or say-so of a director alone would allow a director to plant the seeds of retroactive resignation, only to rely on it at some later date should a director-linked liability emerge. ...
News of Note post
24 June 2019- 12:57am Black Tax Court of Canada finds that an ancillary income-earning purpose for making a loan whose terms were never finalized was sufficient to satisfy s. 20(1)(c)(i) Email this Content Conrad Black controlled both Hollinger Inc. ... Rossiter CJ accepted Black’s position that the borrowed money had been used by Black to make a loan to Inc., so that Black was entitled to an interest deduction on his borrowed funds, stating: Black and Inc. reached an agreement on the essential terms of the loan and left the details to be worked out at a later date. The fact that a formal document outlining those essential terms was to be prepared later on and signed does not alter the validity of the earlier contract. Since Black had an obligation to pay interest expenses on the Quest Loan, Black had to earn interest income on the loan to Inc. in order for him to be made whole. While I find that this was an ancillary purpose compared to his primary purpose of helping Inc., that was a bona fide objective of his investment, which is capable of providing the requisite purpose for interest deductibility under paragraph 20(1)(c). ...
News of Note post
6 July 2021- 11:14pm Adélard Soucy Quebec Court of Appeal finds that a movable structure for warming a soldering operation was not Class 29 property Email this Content The taxpayer custom-fabricated pieces of heavy specialized equipment at the northern mining site of one of its mining customers. ... …. The respondent's Econox serves primarily to shelter the respondent's operations from the weather …. ... Adélard Soucy (1975) Inc., 2021 QCCA 1050 under Schedule II Class 8. ...
News of Note post
Rivoalen JA stated: [S]ection 2 of the Charter protects the rights of the appellant’s members to practise their beliefs in Atheism and the Minister cannot interfere with the practice of these beliefs …. ... The appellant can continue to carry out its purpose and its activities without charitable registration …. ... Canada (National Revenue), 2019 FCA 296 under Charter. s. 2 and ITA s. 149.1(1) charitable organization (a). ...
News of Note post
19 February 2018- 9:19pm RCF IV Federal Court of Australia finds that gains of U.S. limited partners from sales of an Australian resource company were not Treaty exempt but were not TCP-type gains Email this Content Two Caymans investment LPs (“RCF IV” and RCF V”) whose limited partners were mostly U.S. residents, realized gains from the disposal of shares of significant shareholdings in a TSX-listed Australian corporation (Talison Lithium) which, through a grandchild corporation, held mining leases in Australia and carried out an operation there of mining lithium ores and processing them. ... Summaries of Resource Capital Fund IV LP v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 41 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 3, Art. 13, s. 248(1) taxable Canadian property (d), s. 115(1)(a)(ii), s. 9 capital gain. v. profit shares, General Concepts stare decisis, s. 152(1). ...
News of Note post
Sommerfeldt J then considered the exception in ETA s. 191(5), which provides that an individual builder is not required to so self-assess where “after the construction of the complex is substantially completed, the complex is used primarily as a place of residence for the individual [or family].” He quoted the conclusions of Hogan J in Coates that: [S]ubsection 191(5) requires a simple factual determination as to whether or not the property was used as a family home after it was substantially completed. [T[he exception cannot be interpreted as requiring that the property have been built only for purely personal reasons. ... The Queen, 2020 TCC 115 under ETA s. 123(1) builder (f) and s. 191(5). ...

Pages