Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载

Filter by Type:

Results 1 - 10 of 2888 for 制暴无限杀机 下载
News of Note post
Article 135(1)(d) of the Principal VAT Directive exempted “transactions, concerning payments, transfers, debts, but excluding debt collection”. ... (a) of the financial service definition, which exempts the “payment or transfer of money …”.) ... Summary of Target Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 35 under ETA s. 123(1) financial service (a). ...
News of Note post
6 December 2018- 12:29am Burton Federal Court of Australia finds that a foreign tax credit was reduced by ½ when only ½ of a capital gain was brought into income Email this Content An Australian-resident individual was taxed at the 15% long-term U.S. capital gains rate on his gains on the disposal of U.S. oil and gas drilling rights. ... The Article does not suggest that a credit is allowed against Australian tax payable for the whole amount of the US tax paid. It does not prescribe how much is to be allowed as a credit. ... Summaries of Burton v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 1857 under s. 126(1) and Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 24. ...
News of Note post
25 August 2019- 11:54pm Burton Full Federal Court of Australia confirms that a foreign tax credit was reduced by ½ when only ½ of a capital gain was brought into taxable income Email this Content An Australian-resident individual was taxed at the 15% long-term U.S. capital gains rate on his gains on the disposal of U.S. oil and gas drilling rights. ... Summaries of Burton v Commissioner of Taxation, [2019] FCAFC 141 under s. 126(1) and Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 24. ...
News of Note post
10 April 2021- 11:41pm CRA is now applying a “proportionate attribution approach” in applying the EIA s. 5(2)(b) test of “control of voting shares” Email this Content S. 5(2)(b) of the Employment Insurance Act provides that “Insurable employment does not include the employment of a person by a corporation if the person controls more than 40% of the voting shares of the corporation.” ... In stating that it accepted Boifor, so that its previous position was reversed, CRA addressed the example of two 50-50 (or 51-49) shareholders of a Holdco wholly owning their employer (Opco), and stated: In light of the FCA's decision, the CRA must now consider the proportionate attribution approach in similar situations to determine whether the employment of a person who controls more than 40% of the voting shares of the employing corporation is insurable. The proportionate attribution approach leads to the conclusion that the two shareholders each control more than 40% of Opco's voting shares (50% of 100%) for the purposes of EIA paragraph 5(2)(b). [W]here the shareholders held 51% and 49% of the voting shares of Holdco their employment [also] would not be insurable because they had effective control of 51% and 49% of the voting shares of Opco …. ...
News of Note post
7 January 2018- 5:57pm Mac & Mac Tax Court of Canada denies SR&ED claims because of inadequate notes of the work done Email this Content Mac & Mac was approached by a potential client to use its expertise in hydrodemolition to develop a technique to remove the worn inner linings from pipelines, so that the necessity of replacing them would be eliminated. Mac & Mac used numerous different approaches to applying high-pressure water to this end. In denying Mac & Mac’s SR&ED claims, Graham J stated: Mac & Mac’s claims do not meet the last test [in Northwest Hydraulic which] requires Mac & Mac to have kept detailed records of hypotheses, tests and results as the work progressed. There is simply no way that someone, even someone very experienced in the industry, could hope to replicate or confirm Mac & Mac’s results from [its] notes. ...
News of Note post
8 August 2021- 10:57pm Gélinas Court of Quebec finds that a Montreal site qualified as a special work site for a 3 ½ year project Email this Content The taxpayer, who had purchased a house in Richmond, Quebec in 1999 to reside there with his family, worked for his employer (“GPH”) as a project engineer regarding the construction or expansion of factories. Although normally, on such projects, the client of GPH would pay the accommodation costs of the GPH employees who worked on the project, that was not the case for a project for one of the clients in the Montreal area (about 90 minutes from Richmond), which started in 2014 and lasted for 3 ½ years. ... In finding that these amounts were not includible in the taxpayer’s income pursuant to the Quebec equivalents of ITA ss. 6(6)(a)(i) and (b)(i), Lapierre JCQ stated: [T]he fact that the wife and one of the children of the couple also lived in the Longueuil apartment is not very important …. Mr. ...
News of Note post
17 December 2019- 12:03am Dow & Duggan Tax Court of Canada finds that CRA does not have the discretion to stipulate the documentary requirements for direct-shipment export zero-rating Email this Content Sched. ... Summaries of Dow & Duggan Log Homes International (1993) Limited v. ...
News of Note post
18 October 2017- 1:13am Plains Midstream Tax Court of Canada finds that s. 16(1) operates symmetrically (no creditor interest no debtor interest deduction) Email this Content To over-simplify somewhat, Amoco agreed to assume a $225M loan that was due in perhaps 43-years’ time and that was effectively non-interest-bearing (or more precisely, only bore interest to the extent of oil production from the Beaufort Sea) in consideration inter alia for the payment to it of $17.5 million by the debtor. ... In denying any interest deduction, he stated: The language used in subsection 16(1) of the ITA stating that the payment is “deemed to be interest on a debt obligation held by the person to whom the amount is paid or payable” reflects Parliament’s intention that both parties receive symmetrical treatment. [N]o part of the amount that is due by the Appellant can reasonably be regarded as interest that is payable to APCJ under the terms and conditions of the loan. [I]t is unthinkable that Parliament would have intended the asymmetrical treatment proposed by the Appellant as this would open the door to transactions in which one party receives a tax benefit and the other party receives a non-taxable payment, resulting in a one-sided tax expenditure. ... The Queen, 2017 TCC 207 under s. 16(1) and s. 54 adjusted cost base. ...
News of Note post
16 May 2017- 12:37am R & S Industries Tax Court of Canada finds that a taxpayer is not bound by the statement of boot set out in its s. 97(2) election form Email this Content R & S Industries was unsuccessful in a motion to have the Federal Court direct CRA to reconsider its decision to not permit R & S Industries to file an amended s. 97(2) election form so as to change the agreed amounts. ... CRA viewed this as an attempted end-run around R & S’s inability to amend its election, and sought to have the appeal dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. ... Summary of R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75 under s. 97(2). ...
News of Note post
As well procedural gaffes are not so egregious as to require or demand denial of this application. ... Russell J stated in this regard that “there is a semblance of logic to [the corporation’s] position, sufficient to constitute reasonable grounds.” ... Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119 under ETA s. 305(5)(b). ...

Pages