Search - 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数

Results 3691 - 3700 of 3777 for 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
FCTD

McCaffrey v. The Queen and the Minister of National Revenue, 93 DTC 5009, [1993] 1 CTC 15 (FCTD)

Such arrangements as he did make for the receipt of mail during his absence from Canada between March 1988 and December 1989 broke down but that, surely, cannot be laid at the feet of the Minister who acted throughout in the manner required by the Act. ...
FCTD

Del Zotto v. R., [1996] 1 CTC 120, 95 DTC 5636

.: The plaintiff, Mr. Del Zotto, brings two motions. One is to amend the statement of claim pursuant to Rule 420. ...
FCTD

Mervin Holizki v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 2 CTC 420

Robertson had an arrangement with a law firm in Regina, Thauberger & Company, that where a client did not have a lawyer and wished to incorporate, they would use one of the Thauberger "shelf companies" to try to keep the costs manageable. ...
FCTD

Her Majesty the Queen v. William R. Phillips, [1993] 2 CTC 27, 93 DTC 5247

The word allowance” was defined in Ransom v. M.N.R., [1967] C.T.C. 346, 67 D.T.C. 5235, at page 361 (D.T.C. 5244) as follows: An allowance is quite a different thing from reimbursement. ...
FCTD

Pan Ocean Oil Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 2 CTC 236, 93 DTC 5330

Statutory provisions The relevant statutory provisions are subsections 66(6) and (7), 87(1), (2) and (6) of the Income Tax Act: 66(6) Where a corporation (in this subsection referred to as the successor corporation") has, at any time after 1971, acquired by purchase or otherwise (including an acquisition as a result of an amalgamation described in subsection 87(1), from another corporation (in this subsection referred to as the "predecessor corporation") all or substantially all of the property of the predecessor corporation used by it in carrying on in Canada its business, there may be deducted by the successor corporation, in computing its income under this Part for a taxation year, the lesser of.... 66(7) Where a corporation (in this subsection referred to as the "second successor corporation") has, at any time after 1971, acquired by purchase or otherwise (including an acquisition as a result of an amalgamation described in subsection 87(1)), from another corporation (in this subsection referred to as the "first successor corporation") that was a successor corporation within the meaning of subsection (6), all or substantially all of the property of the first successor corporation used by it in carrying on in Canada its business, there may be deducted by the second successor corporation, in computing its income under this Part for a taxation year, the lesser of.... 87(1) In this section, an amalgamation means a merger of two or more corporations each of which was, immediately before the merger, a Canadian corporation (each of which corporations is referred to in this section as a“ predecessor corporation") to form one corporate entity (in this section referred to as the "new corporation") in such a manner that (a) all of the property of the predecessor corporations immediately before the merger becomes property of the new corporation by virtue of the merger, (b) all of the liabilities of the predecessor corporations immediately before the merger become liabilities of the new corporation by virtue of the merger, and (c) all of the shareholders (except any predecessor corporation) of the predecessor corporations immediately before the merger become shareholders of the new corporation by virtue of the merger, otherwise than as a result of the acquisition of property of one corporation by another corporation, pursuant to the purchase of such property by the other corporation or as a result of the distribution of such property to the other corporation upon the winding-up of the corporation. 87(2) Where there has been an amalgamation of two or more corporations after 1971 the following rules apply: (a) for the purposes of this Act, the corporate entity formed as a result of the amalgamation shall be deemed to be a new corporation the first taxation year of which shall be deemed to have commenced at the time of the amalgamation, and a taxation year of a predecessor corporation that would otherwise have ended after the amalgamation shall be deemed to have ended immediately before the amalgamation; 87(6) Where there has been an amalgamation of two or more corporations after 1971 and the new corporation is a principal-business corporation within the meaning assigned by subsection 66(15), there may be deducted by the new corporation in computing its income for a taxation year the aggregate of the following amounts in respect of expenses incurred by the predecessor corporations, namely, in respect of each individual predecessor corporation, the amount that is the lesser of... ...
FCTD

GSW Appliances Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 2 CTC 325

Section 2.1 reads as follows: 2.1 Purchase and Sale of the Acquired assets Upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof, GSWS shall sell, transfer, assign and deliver to the company, and the company shall purchase and acquire, at the closing (but with effect as of the effective date), all of the property and assets (other than excluded assets) of GSWS's major appliance operations (hereafter collectively called the cquired assets"). ...
FCTD

H.B. Fenn and Company Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1992] 2 CTC 49

The carrier was the Norfolk and Western Railway Company which contacted Donna MacCullouch, Office Manager in Welland of Livingston International (a subagent for the plaintiff's customs broker, the latter being Hemisphere Freight & Brokerage Services Inc. of Toronto). ...
FCTD

Crestbrook Forest Industries Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1991] 2 CTC 195, 91 DTC 5521

Thomson & Associates Ltd. of Victoria, B.C., to make a survey of pulp and newsprint pricing discounts and commissions in that industry. ...
FCTD

Her Majesty the Queen v. Robert Duncan and Stephen Petroff, [1991] 2 CTC 360, 91 DTC 5615

.), enunciated the test to be met with respect to the previous subsection 225.2(1): ”... the issue is not whether the collection per se is in jeopardy but rather whether the actual jeopardy arises from the likely delay in the collection thereof. ...
FCTD

Lloyd Youngman v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1986] 2 CTC 475, 86 DTC 6584

The evaluation formula was set out in Schedule “A” of the defence as follows: Corporation's Equity in the residence $316,135.79 Return on investment of $316,135.79 at 9% $28,452.00 Mortgage interest, municipal taxes and insurance paid by the corporation 8,799.00 Gross Benefit to Plaintiff and wife received from corporation 37,251.00 Less: Amount of benefit attributable to Plaintiff’s wife 18,625.00 Amount of benefit attributable to Plaintiff 18,625.00 Less: Rent and expenses paid by Plaintiff 12,100.00 Net amount of benefit to the Plaintiff $ 6,526.00 The final assumption was that the corporation did not build the residence for the purpose of producing or gaining income from a business or property. ...

Pages