Search - 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
Results 181 - 190 of 3367 for 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
Conference summary
7 November 2002 CTF Roundtable Q. 1, 2002-0144140 - CTF STEWART & WALLS -- summary under Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit
7 November 2002 CTF Roundtable Q. 1, 2002-0144140- CTF STEWART & WALLS-- summary under Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 3- Paragraph 3(a)- Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit REOP test not applied if no personal element and only tax motivation In response to various questions on the impact of Stewart and Walls including its impact on CCRA’s use of the reasonable expectation of profit test,(“REOP”), CCRA stated inter alia: The REOP test, as it previously applied, will no longer be used to determine if there is a source of income under the Act. ... At this point, a taxpayer's venture will be reviewed and criteria, including those set down in Moldowan, will be considered in determining if the taxpayer intends to carry on an activity for profit and the overall evidence supports that intention. … If a taxpayer is motivated by tax considerations when he or she enters into a business or property venture, this will not detract from the venture's commercial nature or characterization as a source of income under the Act. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
8 June 2018 Internal T.I. 2018-0744881I7 - Regulation 403 – allocation of income -- summary under Subsection 400(1)
8 June 2018 Internal T.I. 2018-0744881I7- Regulation 403 – allocation of income-- summary under Subsection 400(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Regulation 400- Subsection 400(1) a partner is attributed each PE of a partnership for Reg. 400(1) purposes Under Regs. 403(1) and (3), a property insurer (or, in this case, a reinsurer) is required to allocate its taxable income to the provinces on the basis of the respective proportions of its net property insurance premiums that are arrived at by allocating its net premiums to the provinces where the insured property is situate – except that if it does not have a permanent establishment in a particular province, the net premiums for the insured property in that province are allocated to the province which has a PE to which those net premiums are “reasonably attributable.” ...
Conference summary
11 October 2019 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 8, 2019-0811901C6 F - RRIF – Minimum amount after death -- summary under Minimum Amount
11 October 2019 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 8, 2019-0811901C6 F- RRIF – Minimum amount after death-- summary under Minimum Amount Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 146.3- Subsection 146.3(1)- Minimum Amount required recognition of RRIF minimum amount in post-terminal year of transfer of RRIF to surviving spouse The deceased, who died in November, bequeathed his RRIF to his surviving spouse, to whom it was transferred in the subsequent year. ... CRA also indicated, in the situation where the death had occurred before the deceased could withdraw the minimum amount for the year of death, but the transfer of his RRIF to the surviving spouse was not made until the following calendar year, then there was no need for the RRIF issuer to pay the minimum amount for the year of death – but that the eligible amount received by the surviving spouse in the subsequent year would be reduced by the minimum amount for that year. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
1 August 2019 External T.I. 2018-0768561E5 - Application Administrative Position on US LLPs & LLLP -- summary under Section 96
1 August 2019 External T.I. 2018-0768561E5- Application Administrative Position on US LLPs & LLLP-- summary under Section 96 Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 96 no ability for an otherwise grandfathered LLLP to treat itself prospectively as a corporation Two Florida or Delaware LLLPs (held by Canadian resident corporations) that have filed as partnerships for Canadian tax purposes since the time of their formation are looking to be treated as corporations for Canadian tax purposes on a prospective basis. After having noted that one of the conditions for its administrative practice of allowing any such entities formed before April 26, 2017 to file as a partnership was that “no member of the entity and/or the entity itself takes inconsistent positions from one taxation year to another … between partnership and corporate treatment,” CRA stated in response to a query dated June 29, 2018: In our view, the change by the LLLPs from partnership to corporate treatment constitutes taking an inconsistent position from one taxation year to the next and accordingly, the first condition noted above would not be met. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
1 August 2019 External T.I. 2018-0768561E5 - Application Administrative Position on US LLPs & LLLP -- summary under Corporation
1 August 2019 External T.I. 2018-0768561E5- Application Administrative Position on US LLPs & LLLP-- summary under Corporation Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Corporation LLLPs cannot be viewed as corporations solely on a prospective basis 2017-0691131C6 stated that one of the conditions for allowing Delaware or Florida LLLPs formed before April 26, 2017 to file as a partnership was that “no member of the entity and/or the entity itself takes inconsistent positions from one taxation year to another … between partnership and corporate treatment.” ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
17 January 2020 External T.I. 2017-0685341E5 - Tax Comparison of the FIT & Net Metering Programs -- summary under Computation of Profit
17 January 2020 External T.I. 2017-0685341E5- Tax Comparison of the FIT & Net Metering Programs-- summary under Computation of Profit Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 9- Computation of Profit a credit generated by a business under the Ontario Net Metering Program is only income when applied, and is offset by a deduction for the electricity consumed Under the Net Metering Program administered by the Ontario Power Authority, a participant who generates electricity primarily for its own use from a renewable energy source is billed only for the difference between the value of the electricity consumed by the participant and the value of the electricity supplied to the provincial electrical distribution system, so that where the value of the participant’s electricity consumption is less than the value of the excess electricity supplied, the participant will accumulate a credit, which is available for use against the participant’s future electricity consumption in the next billing period – and if the accumulated credit cannot be used in its entirety within a given 12-month period, it will be forfeited as of the next billing period. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
17 January 2020 External T.I. 2017-0685341E5 - Tax Comparison of the FIT & Net Metering Programs -- summary under Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit
17 January 2020 External T.I. 2017-0685341E5- Tax Comparison of the FIT & Net Metering Programs-- summary under Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 3- Paragraph 3(a)- Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit credits received under the Ontario Net Metering Program respecting electricity generated for personal consumption are not income Under the Net Metering Program administered by the Ontario Power Authority, a participant who generates electricity primarily for the participant’s own use from a renewable energy source is billed only for the difference between the value of the electricity consumed by the participant and the value of the electricity supplied to the provincial electrical distribution system, so that where the value of the participant’s electricity consumption is less than the value of the excess electricity supplied, the participant will accumulate a credit, which is available for use against the participant’s future electricity consumption in the next billing period – and if the accumulated credit cannot be used in its entirety within a given 12-month period, it will be forfeited as of the next billing period. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
15 June 2020 External T.I. 2020-0850981E5 - CECRA – Pension plan eligibility -- summary under Clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C)
15 June 2020 External T.I. 2020-0850981E5- CECRA – Pension plan eligibility-- summary under Clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 149- Subsection 149(1)- Paragraph 149(1)(o.2)- Subparagraph 149(1)(o.2)(ii)- Clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C) CECRA loans give rise to income from real property and thus are not a disqualified borrowing The Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance Program (the “CECRA”) offers unsecured, forgivable loans to eligible commercial property owners (“Owner”), with the Owner offering qualifying small business tenants a rent reduction of at least 75% for rent otherwise due in respect of April, May and June 2020, and with the CECRA loan fund covering 50% of the rent and the Owner agrees to forgo receipt of the other 25%. ... The borrowing restriction applicable to pension real estate corporations in clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C) is less restrictive. … [O]ur views are as follows: Participating in the CECRA with respect to commercial property held by a pension real estate corporation will not contravene the borrowing restriction in clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C). ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
15 June 2020 External T.I. 2020-0850981E5 - CECRA – Pension plan eligibility -- summary under Paragraph 8502(i)
15 June 2020 External T.I. 2020-0850981E5- CECRA – Pension plan eligibility-- summary under Paragraph 8502(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Regulation 8502- Paragraph 8502(i) CECRA loans do not lead to deregistration of an RPP The CECRA program contemplates the making of loans to commercial landlords to partially fund their providing rent relief to qualifying tenants, followed by forgiveness of such loans on December 31, 2020 if the landlord has complied with the program terms. ... The borrowing restriction applicable to pension real estate corporations in clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C) is less restrictive. … [O]ur views are as follows: Participating in the CECRA with respect to commercial property held by a pension real estate corporation will not contravene the borrowing restriction in clause 149(1)(o.2)(ii)(C). ...
Conference summary
8 July 2020 CALU Roundtable Q. 2, 2020-0842141C6 - Return of premiums on death & CDA -- summary under Paragraph (d)
8 July 2020 CALU Roundtable Q. 2, 2020-0842141C6- Return of premiums on death & CDA-- summary under Paragraph (d) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 89- Subsection 89(1)- Capital Dividend Account- Paragraph (d) a refund of premiums on death under a life insurance policy can increase the CDA of the corporate owner A private corporation is the owner and beneficiary of an exempt life insurance policy (with an adjusted cost basis of $90,000) on the life of a shareholder, who dies from, say, suicide or skydiving, which does not void the policy, but instead results in the insurer repaying all premiums ($100,000). ... CRA responded: A disposition of an interest in a life insurance policy is defined in subsection 148(9) of the Act and specifically excludes a payment made under an exempt life insurance policy as a consequence of the death of a person whose life was insured under the policy. … Where proceeds of a life insurance policy are received by a corporation as a beneficiary under an exempt life insurance policy in consequence of death of any person, the proceeds would not, in our view, generally be received as the result of a disposition in relation to an interest in a life insurance policy under subsection 148(9) of the Act. ...