Search - 三河市 市委书记 现任
Results 141 - 150 of 78611 for 三河市 市委书记 现任
TCC
A & T Tire & Wheel Limited v. M.N.R., 2009 TCC 640
A & T Tire & Wheel Limited v. M.N.R., 2009 TCC 640 Docket: 2009-911(EI) BETWEEN: A & T TIRE & WHEEL LIMITED, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent, and JUSTIN BUNN, Intervener.____________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on common evidence with the appeal of A & T Tire & Wheel Limited (2009‑912(CPP)) on November 26 and 27, 2009 at Toronto, Ontario Before: The Honourable N. ... Weisman" Weisman D.J. Citation: 2009 TCC 640 Date: 20091224 Dockets: 2009-911(EI) 2009-912(CPP) BETWEEN: A & T TIRE & WHEEL LIMITED, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent, and JUSTIN BUNN, Intervener. ... Weisman, Deputy Judge DATE OF JUDGMENT: December 24, 2009 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Appellant: Leigh Somerville Taylor Counsel for the Respondent: Thang Trieu For the Intervener: The Intervener himself COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: Leigh Somerville Taylor Richler and Tari Toronto, Ontario For the Respondent: John H. ...
22 December 2020 GST/HST Interpretation 209955 - – Public Service Body Rebate – Whether subsidies under certain programs are considered government funding] […] -- summary under Subsection 259(2)
22 December 2020 GST/HST Interpretation 209955- – Public Service Body Rebate – Whether subsidies under certain programs are considered government funding] […]-- summary under Subsection 259(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 259- Subsection 259(2) CEWS and TWS did not count towards 40% government funding A non-profit organization (NPO) generally is entitled to GST/HST public service body rebates if the percentage of its “government funding” (defined in s. 2 the Public Service Body Rebate (GST/HST) Regulations) is at least 40%. ... CRA concluded that the CEWS was not government funding under the definition, given that it “is a refund in respect of income taxes imposed under the ITA” and it “is not paid for the purpose of financially assisting the NPO in carrying out the purposes of the NPO. “ CRA applied a somewhat similar analysis to find that the 10% temporary wage subsidy for employers program also did not count as government funding. ...
Current CRA website
Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy – Post-payment audits – Status Update –
Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy – Post-payment audits – Status Update – March 2023 On this page Purpose Scope Post-payment CEWS Audits – Key Findings Audit Selection Post-payment Audit Program – Phased Approach Post-payment CEWS audits – Segmentation Post-payment Audit Results Preparer-linked Files Observations related to Auditor General Report 10 – Specific COVID-19 Benefits Overview Key Findings Conclusion Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide an update on the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA's) Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) post-payment audit program, including results, findings, and observations with respect to the Office of the Auditor General’s (OAG) Report 10 – Specific COVID-19 Benefits tabled in Parliament on December 6, 2022. ... Post-payment CEWS Audits – Key Findings Results of completed post-payment audits demonstrate high levels of compliance. ... Of the $5.53 billion, $325 million (5.9 %) were denied or adjusted. There are 2,014 audits in progress, representing an additional $10.35 billion in CEWS claims. ...
22 December 2020 GST/HST Interpretation 209955 - – Public Service Body Rebate – Whether subsidies under certain programs are considered government funding] […] -- summary under Government Funding
22 December 2020 GST/HST Interpretation 209955- – Public Service Body Rebate – Whether subsidies under certain programs are considered government funding] […]-- summary under Government Funding Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Regulations- Public Service Body Rebate (GST/HST) Regulations- Section 2- Government Funding CEWS received by an NPO does not qualify as government funding for GST/HST PSB rebate purposes Are the Canada emergency wage subsidy (“CEWS”) and the 10% temporary wage subsidy for employers (“TWS”) programs considered government funding for purposes of s. 2 the Public Service Body Rebate (GST/HST) Regulations? After noting that s. 2 excluded a “refund, rebate or remission of, or credit in respect of, taxes” and referenced a purpose of “financially assisting the particular person in carrying out the purposes of the particular person” and further indicating that the purpose of the two programs was to “re-hire workers previously laid off as a result of COVID-19, help prevent further job losses, and better position businesses to resume normal operations following the crisis,” CRA found that the CEWS was not government funding under s. 2, given that it “is a refund in respect of income taxes imposed under the ITA” and it “is not paid for the purpose of financially assisting the NPO in carrying out the purposes of the NPO. “ Regarding the TWS, it also noted that an eligible employer does not reduce its deductions from its employees’ pay and remits less to the Receiver General. ...
News of Note post
16 May 2017- 12:37am R & S Industries – Tax Court of Canada finds that a taxpayer is not bound by the statement of boot set out in its s. 97(2) election form Email this Content R & S Industries was unsuccessful in a motion to have the Federal Court direct CRA to reconsider its decision to not permit R & S Industries to file an amended s. 97(2) election form so as to change the agreed amounts. ... CRA viewed this as an attempted end-run around R & S’s inability to amend its election, and sought to have the appeal dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. ... Summary of R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75 under s. 97(2). ...
9 March 2016- 11:39pm R & S Industries – Federal Court appears to interpret a s. 97(2) drop-down agreement as preventing a re-allocation of boot to avoid gain Email this Content An agreement for the drop-down under s. 97(2) of assets by the taxpayer (R & S) to a subsidiary LP specified that the elected amounts in a joint s. 97(2) election, and the respective portions of the Purchase Price allocated to the transferred assets, would be the minimum agreed amounts permitted under the Act, “provided …that in respect of the Goodwill, the elected amount shall, unless otherwise agreed be equal to $2,502,600.” ... When CRA rejected the request for an amended election, 15 months passed before R & S sought judicial review of this decision in the Federal Court. ... Summaries of R & S Industries Inc. v. MNR, 2016 FC 275 under Federal Court Act, s. 18.1(2) and ITA s. 97(2). ...
News of Note post
As well … procedural gaffes are not so egregious as to require or demand denial of this application. ... Russell J stated in this regard that “there is a semblance of logic to … [the corporation’s] position, sufficient to constitute reasonable grounds.” ... Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119 under ETA s. 305(5)(b). ...
News of Note post
28 February 2023- 12:08am K & D Logging – Tax Court of Canada finds that a s. 20(21) deduction cannot offset previously-recognized s. 17 income Email this Content The taxpayer (K & D) initially recognized interest from year to year at the prescribed rate under s. 17 on a loan to a Uruguay farming corporation (Interan) of which it was a 44% shareholder. ... K & D argued that it could obtain a deduction under s. 20(21), for the amount of the interest previously recognized by it, on the loan’s disposition (its partial repayment). ... Summary of K & D Logging Ltd. v. The King, 2023 TCC 23 under s. 20(21). ...
8 June 2014- 11:28pm Francis & Associates – Tax Court of Canada finds that substantively-correct bad debt deductions cannot be claimed in an amended return Email this Content Due to problems with its accounting system, a law firm did not discover until late in 2005 that billings made in 2002 to 2004 and which had become bad in those years had not been written off in the accounts. ... Summary of Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 under s. 20(1)(p)(i). ...
3 November 2013- 10:48pm D & D Livestock – Tax Court finds that stock dividends could be used to double-up on safe income Email this Content The safe income on hand (SIOH) of the holding company (HLL) for the taxpayer in respect of its shares of the taxpayer included safe income of $1.0M earned directly by the taxpayer and a further $0.5M earned in respect of a 50% shareholding (RTI shares) held by a subsidiary of the taxpayer (Newco 3). ... Summary of D & D Livestock Ltd. v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 318 under s. 55(2). ...