Search - 三河市 市委书记 现任

In denying the taxpayer’s SR&ED claims, Graham J stated (at paras 7, 8, 9 and 10): Mac & Mac’s claims … do not meet the last test [in Northwest Hydraulic.] ... Mac & Mac kept a set of handwritten notes. … There is simply no way that someone, even someone very experienced in the industry, could hope to replicate or confirm Mac & Mac’s results from these notes. A spreadsheet … provided more detail than the notes. However, it was prepared after the fact for the purpose of supporting the SR&ED claim and still did not contain the level of detail I would have expected. … As noted … in Highweb & Page Group Inc. v. ...

Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. The Queen, 2009 DTC 1179 [at at 958], 2009 TCC 299, aff'd 2010 DTC 5164 [at 7293], 2010 FCA 251-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt payment by direction A Canadian corporation ("C&A") paid two dividends to its Canadian-resident parent ("Holdings"), which distributed the same amounts to its U.S. ...

Ed Sinclair Construction & Supplies Ltd. v. MNR, 92 DTC 1163, [1992] 1 CTC 2218 (TCC)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt no payment by mere book entry Bowman J. stated: A mere bookkeeping entry in a loan account by itself does not constitute a taxable event unless there is something more, such as receipt. ...

The Queen, 2017 TCC 73 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development solving narrowly-cast production engineering problems was not SR&ED The taxpayer was a corporation that improved customer’s equipment by increasing their lifespan, improving their security mechanisms or by standardizing them in order to produce economies of scale. In 2012, it entered into four separate contracts with four customers to provide them with specific solutions within the scope of this services business, and treated $182,483 of the expenditures which in incurred in the course of performing this customer-specific work as SR & ED expenditures. Respecting the first project undertaken for an alcohol products company, Jorré J stated (at paras 50, 58, and 62-63, TaxInterpretations translation): … [T]he purpose of the project was to make the palletizers and depalletizers [of beverage bottles] conform to current security standards and to eliminate the risk of the lifting platform falling when an operator or mechanic was underneath. … … [T]here is nothing in the evidence that suggests that palletizers and depalletizers meeting the required safety standards do not already exist or that there is an improvement over what already existed. … … Difficulties by themselves are not sufficient for their resolution to become experimental development. ...

Patricia & Daniel Blais O/A Satronics Satellites v The Queen, 2010 TCC 361, 2010 DTC 1271 [at 3904] (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Paragraph 212(1)(d) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212- Subsection 212(1)- Paragraph 212(1)(d) payments to access satellite network were not rent or royalty The taxpayers sold individual customers access to the satellite network of an American firm ("NPS"). ... Saint John Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. ([1980] C.T.C. 352 (F.C.A.)) for the proposition that a "rent" connotes a grant of property that lasts for a fixed or determinable term, reverting thereafter to the grantor. ...

The Queen, 2019 TCC 65 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development development of custom software qualified as SR&ED The taxpayer, which was an engineering firm specializing in developing public transit related technology, engaged in a project to develop its web‑based system using algorithms and GPS data to provide accurate real‑time data for predicting the arrival time of public transit buses. In finding that the taxpayer satisfied the five-factor test in Northwest Hydraulic Smith J stated (at paras 19, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28): [T]he objectives which the Appellants sought to achieve were sufficiently uncertain during the subject years. … [T]he Appellant’s Project was much more than “quality control or routine testing (…)” excluded by paragraph (f) of the Act, and … there was a “technological risk or uncertainty”. ... I … find that Appellant applied the scientific method and that its activities were structured to remove a technological uncertainty through the formulation and testing of its hypothesis. … [P]aragraph (d) of the definition of SRED includes “work undertaken for the purpose of achieving technological advancement for the purpose of creating new, or improving existing, materials, devices, products or processes, including incremental improvements thereto”. ...

R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75-- summary under Subsection 97(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 97- Subsection 97(2) taxpayer is not bound by the statement of boot set out in its s. 97(2) election form The taxpayer (“R & S”) transferred its business to a limited partnership, with a joint s. 97(2) election being made. The Minister reassessed R & S to include substantial amounts in its income as a result of the transfer. A request by R & S and the partnership to file an amended election was denied by the Minister and the Federal Court denied their application for judicial review of this decision. ...

K & D Logging Ltd. v. The King, 2023 TCC 23-- summary under Subsection 20(21) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 20- Subsection 20(21) a s. 20(21) deduction cannot offset previously-recognized s. 17 income The taxpayer (K & D), which along with three other lenders, advanced funds in 1996 to a Uruguay farming corporation (Interan) of which the taxpayer was a 44% shareholder. ... On a CRA audit in 2009, a copy of the loan agreement was obtained by K & D from Uruguay, and it was determined that the loan was non-interest-bearing. K & D now argued that its deduction of an amount equal to the amounts it had previously recognized as interest income was authorized under s. 20(21). ...

R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75-- summary under Subsection 171(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 171- Subsection 171(1) Tax Court had jurisdiction to consider change to description of consideration in s. 97(2) election form R & S Industries was unsuccessful in a motion to have the Federal Court direct CRA to reconsider its decision to not permit R & S Industries to file an amended s. 97(2) election form so as to change the agreed amounts. R & S then appealed to the Tax Court with a view to convincing the Court that the allocation of consideration between partnership-interest and non-partnership interest consideration set out on the (T2059) election form did not reflect the actual agreed allocation. CRA viewed this as an attempted end run around R & S’s inability to amend its election, and sought to have the appeal dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. ...

The Queen, 2010 TCC 467-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt set-off of debt constituted payment thereof The shareholder of a Canadian company (“Merchant 2000”) lent U.S. $650,000 to a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary (“Merchant U.S.”) of Merchant 2000, and subsequently transferred that receivable to Merchant 2000 in exchange for a receivable from Merchant 2000 of $650,000. ... (See for example: Armstrong … 88 D.T.C. 1015 ….) ...