Her Majesty the Queen v. Metropolitan Properties Limited as Successor to Metropolitan Construction LTD, [1974] CTC 527, 74 DTC 6434 -- text

Bastin, DJ:—This action is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dated September 13, 1973 whereby an appeal by the defendant against a reassessment of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1969 taxation year in which the Minister

Universal Timber Products Ltd. v. The Queen, 74 DTC 6413, [1974] CTC 499 (FCA) -- text

Thurlow, J (concurred in by Ryan, J and Sheppard, DJ—judgment delivered from the Bench):—The question raised by this appeal is whether an amount of $100,000 which the appellant received in its 1967 taxation year from Jackson Brothers Logging Company Limited was

Rapistan Canada Ltd. v. MNR, 74 DTC 6426, [1974] CTC 495, briefly aff'd 76 DTC 6177, [1976] CTC 296 (SCC) -- text

The Chief Justice (concurred in by Mackay and Sweet, DJJ—judgment delivered from the Bench):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from the appellant’s assessments under Part I of the Income

Cam Gard Supply Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1974] CTC 487, 74 DTC 6429 -- text

Thurlow, J (concurred in by Ryan, J):—This appeal is from a judgment of the Trial Division which dismissed the appellant’s appeal from reassessments of income tax for the years 1964, 1965, 1966 and 1967. The question at issue with respect to all

Longueuil Meat Exporting Co. Ltd. v. The Queen, 74 DTC 6421, [1974] C.TC. 486 (FCA), aff'd 76 DTC 6145, [1976] CTC 193 (SCC) -- text

The Chief Justice (concurred in by Lacroix and Mackay, DJJ—judgment delivered from the Bench):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing with costs an “appeal” from a reassessment of the appellant’s tax under Part I of the Income

Robert Howard Smith Et Al v. Deputy Minister of Revenue of the Province of Quebec, [1974] CTC 478 -- text

Owen, JA:—This is an appeal from part of a judgment of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, September 14, 1972, on a stated case under Article 448 CP, by the executors of and the residuary beneficiaries under the will of the late E

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS