Heald, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board allowing the defendant’s appeal for the 1970 taxation year. Pursuant to Rule 475, this appeal was set down for hearing, and was argued before me, on a stated case.
Collier, J:—The reasons for judgment in the appeal of Danalan Investments Ltd v MNR (p 251) apply in this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Collier, J:—This is an appeal by Danalan Investments Ltd against reassessments issued by the respondent for the years 1962 to 1965 inclusive. Another appeal, Wendilee Investments Ltd v MNR was heard at the same time as this appeal.
Sheppard, DJ:—The issue is whether the appellant, J&J Hotels Ltd, is entitled to deduct, as an expense for the income tax year 1967, the sum of $25,342, as paid to Vernon Motors Limited, for washing automobiles. The sum was disallowed by the Minister in
Collier, J:—This is an appeal by the taxpayer from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board. There is also a cross-appeal by the respondent Minister relating to one aspect of the judgment of the Tax Appeal Board.
Collier, J:—In the taxation years under review here (1964 to 1967) the appellant says it was the general partner in a limited partnership with five family trusts as the other partners. Whether there was in fact or in law such a partnership is
Sweet, DJ:—This is an appeal against a reassessment in respect of the late Mr Abe Levine for the taxation year 1965.
Particulars in connection with the reassessment were:
Collier, J:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff against reassessments by the defendant whereby the defendant brought into taxable income for the years 1965 and 1967 the sums of $1,060 and $529.46 respectively. These amounts were received by the plaintiff
Martland, J (orally for the Court):—Since the adjournment yesterday we have had the opportunity fully to consider the submissions made on behalf of the appellant. We are all of the opinion that the judgment of the Exchequer Court was correct. The
Martland, J (orally for the Court):—We are all of the opinion that the decisions of the Tax Appeal Board and of the Exchequer Court were correct. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
