Her Majesty the Queen v. Garry Bowl Limited, [1973] CTC 712, 73 DTC 5525 -- text
Kerr, J (orally):—This is a motion for judgment in favour of the plaintiff on the basis of allegations made and admitted in the pleadings.
Kerr, J (orally):—This is a motion for judgment in favour of the plaintiff on the basis of allegations made and admitted in the pleadings.
The Chief Justice (judgment delivered from the Bench) (all concur):— This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing with costs an appeal from reassessments of the appellant, who is a building contractor, under Part I of the Income
Urie, J:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Tax Review Board dated November 20, 1972, affirming an assessment relating to a profit realized by the plaintiff in his 1969 taxation year from the sale of a tugboat named
Lande, J:—The Court having examined the proceedings, studied the law and the written notes of the parties and having deliberated on the whole.
Sweet, DJ:—The Crown granted to the plaintiff, Jackson Brothers Logging Company Limited (herein referred to as Jackson) and Phillips and Lee Logging Limited (herein referred to as Phillips and Lee) timber sale harvesting licence A 00044 dated October 2, 1967
Cattanach, J:—The two appeals indicated in the above styles of cause came before the Court contemporaneously pursuant to an order dated June 23, 1970 given by the President of the Exchequer Court of Canada, now the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Canada,
Sheppard, DJ:—The issue is the liability of the plaintiff to income tax on shares in his name under subparagraph 6(1)(a)(i) and subsection 16(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Fitzpatrick, J (orally):—Duncan J Morris is charged with five offences under paragraph 132(1 )(a) of the Income Tax Act and with one offence under paragraph 132(1)(d) of the same Act. The five offences under paragraph 132(1)(a) charge Mr Morris
Kerr, J:—This action was tried together with another action No 920-71 between Price (Nfld) Pulp & Paper Limited, as suppliant and Her Majesty the Queen, as respondent.* They were commenced by petitions of right in the Exchequer Court claiming refunds
Cattanach, J:—By order of Mr Justice Sheppard dated April 18, 1973, the four actions mentioned in the styles of cause above were placed on the trial list together to be heard at the same time on common evidence.