Pratte, J:—The plaintiff is appealing from a decision of the Tax Review Board, which upheld the decision of the Minister of National Revenue to add to the declared income of the plaintiff for the years 1967 and 1968 the sum of $17,230.70 for

Sweet, DJ:—This is an appeal from the. decision of the Tax Appeal Board allowing the respondent’s appeal against the respondent’s income tax assessments for the 1966 and 1967 taxation years.

Sweet, DJ:—This is an appeal from the reassessment of income of the appellant for the taxation year 1968. The notification by the Minister under section 58 of the Income Tax Act indicates that in particular the assessment was

Collier, J (orally):—This is an appeal by the appellant taxpayer against a reassessment by the respondent Minister whereby the respondent added to the taxable income for the year 1969 of a company called Trendline Construction Limited (hereafter “Trendline”) the

Pratte, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board upholding the decision of the Minister of National Revenue tb claim an amount of $3,036.75 from the appellant by virtue of the Estate Tax Act, RSC 1970, c E-9.

Walsh, J:—This appeal relies on the application of subsection 83(3) of the old Income Tax Act, RSC 1952, c 148, which excludes from income:

Heald, J:—This is an appeal from a reassessment by the respondent of the appellant’s income tax for the taxation year ended December 31, 1967.

Perrier, DJ (orally, per curiam):—The judgment of the Honourable Camil Noël, ACJ is hereby affirmed.

Cattanach, J:—These are appeals by the plaintiff from its assessments to income tax by the Minister of National Revenue under the Income Tax Act in respect to the laintiff's 1968 and 1969 taxation years.

Urie, J:—These appeals are from decisions of the Tax Appeal Board dismissing the appellants’ appeals from their reassessments under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the 1964 taxation year. By consent the appeals were heard