Estate of Adolphina Thornton Tassie v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 2212, 73 DTC 180 -- text

A W Prociuk (orally):—The executors and trustees of the Estate of Adolphina Thornton Tassie appeal from an assessment by the respondent dated June 19, 1972, wherein federal estate tax in the sum of $2340.60 was levied on the net value of

Myer D Brody v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 2206, 73 DTC 176 -- text

The Assistant Chairman:—These are the appeals of Myer D Brody from assessments of the appellant’s 1969 and 1970 taxation years in which amounts of $3,882.50 and $5,879.50 respectively, claimed. by the appellant as medical expenses in those yéars, were

W Vézina & Fils Ltée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 2197, 73 DTC 149 -- text

The Chairman (orally):—This is an appeal by W Vézina & fils Ltée against the reassessment of the Minister of National Revenue for the taxation year 1965 in which a sum paid into a pension plan, pursuant to section 76, for past services,

William Earl Lowry v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 2191, 73 DTC 163 -- text

A W Prociuk:—This appeal came on for hearing before the Board during the February sittings in Toronto, Ontario, which commenced on February 19; 1973. On that date the appellant appeared in person and complained that he experienced great difficulty in

Marksim Storage Ltd. v. MNR, 73 DTC 158, [1973] CTC 2185 (T.R.B.), rev'd 76 DTC 6401, [1976] CTC 665 (FCTD) -- text

The Assistant Chairman:—These are the appeals of Marksim Storage Limited and Heleis Storage Limited from assessments to income tax for the 1963, 1964 and 1965 taxation years, and of Freda Limited and Audrey Cold Storage Limited from assessments to

Dominic Cobetto, Raymond Eudes and Aurélien Poirier v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 2174, 73 DTC 145 -- text

The Chairman (orally):—Mr La Rocque, with the concurrence of Mr Drolet, having moved that the evidence to be given in the appeal of the Estate of John Primeau and the decision therein shall apply equally to these three appeals:

Therefore it is ordered and adjudged that, for the reasons given at the close of the proceedings in the Primeau appeal, these appeals in respect of the 1966 taxation year be and the same are hereby allowed and the matter referred back to the respondent for reassessment accordingly.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS