Pratte, J:—When he declared his income for the years 1955 to 1965, respondent did not allow for the fact that Hull City Transport Ltd, a company in which he was the majority shareholder, had paid one Walter F Thorn annual amounts of $3,000 from 1955

Cattanach, J:—These are appeals by James F Kennedy from his assessments to income tax by the Minister of National Revenue for his 1965 and 1966 taxation years. At all material times the appellant was the sole beneficial owner of all the shares in and

The Associate Chief Justice:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Tax Appeal Board, dated April 27, 1970, dismissing the appellant’s appeals from its income tax assessments for 1963 and 1964 taxation years whereby amounts of $867,365.76 and $95,287.49 for the

Evans, JA (concurred in by Gale, CJO and MacKay, JA):—This is an appeal by the Attorney General of Canada, with leave of the Court, from the acquittal of the respondent by His Honour Judge Graburn on November 1, 1970 on three charges, prosecuted on

Cattanach, J:—These are appeals from the appellant’s assessments to income tax by the Minister for its 1964, 1965 and 1966 taxation years. The assessments were made following directions by the Minister dated August 16, 1968 pursuant to the provisions of subsection 138A(2) of the Income Tax Act that the following companies are deemed to be associated with each other in their 1965 and 1966 taxation years:

(1) Loewen Holdings Ltd

(2) C T Loewen & Sons (1957) Ltd

(3) Build-A-Home Co, Ltd

Collier, J:—This appeal, which was argued on an Agreed Statement of Facts, is from an assessment by the respondent whereby the appellant company’s income tax for the year 1965 was increased by the sum of $60,125.99.

Martland, J (all concur):—By his will, made on August 21, 1962, the late Percival Archibald Woodward, hereinafter referred to as “the testator”, directed his executors to grant, transfer, assign, deliver and set over to Mr and Mrs P A Woodward’s Foundation, hereinafter

Martland, J (all concur):—This appeal is from a judgment of the Exchequer Court, which allowed the appeals of James A Cameron, the respondent in the present appeal, from assessments to income tax for his 1965 and 1966 taxation years.

Sheppard, DJ:—The facts and proceedings are fully set out in the Reasons for Judgment of the learned trial judge and need not be repeated here.

Cattanach, J:—This is an appeal by the Minister from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dated February 23, 1971 whereby appeals by the respondents herein from their assessments to income tax for their 1963 and 1964 taxation years were allowed.