Collier, J:—This is an appeal from an assessment by the respondent which in effect disallowed the appellant’s contention that its income for its fiscal year ending February 28, 1967 was exempt from taxation by virtue of subsection 83(5) of the income

Gibson, J (orally):—In this matter the evidence adduced by the appellant amply proved that the lease contract (Exhibit 5), and the so- called service contract (Exhibit 6), both dated December 31, 1965, were bona fide business transactions, not shams;*

Collier, J:— This is an appeal by a non-resident trust against an assessment by the Minister which seeks to add back into the taxable income of the trust for the year 1969 capital cost deductions previously allowed to the trust. The trust had owned real

Kerr, J:—This is an appeal from the appellant’s income tax assessment for the year 1967.

Collier, J:—The appellant appeals against an assessment in respect to its 1963 income. The respondent, for that year, added to the appellant’s income the sum of $7,459,055.25, the alleged profit realized on the transfer of certain natural gas storage leases to Tecumseh

Pratte, J:—When he declared his income for the years 1955 to 1965, respondent did not allow for the fact that Hull City Transport Ltd, a company in which he was the majority shareholder, had paid one Walter F Thorn annual amounts of $3,000 from 1955

Cattanach, J:—These are appeals by James F Kennedy from his assessments to income tax by the Minister of National Revenue for his 1965 and 1966 taxation years. At all material times the appellant was the sole beneficial owner of all the shares in and

The Associate Chief Justice:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Tax Appeal Board, dated April 27, 1970, dismissing the appellant’s appeals from its income tax assessments for 1963 and 1964 taxation years whereby amounts of $867,365.76 and $95,287.49 for the

Evans, JA (concurred in by Gale, CJO and MacKay, JA):—This is an appeal by the Attorney General of Canada, with leave of the Court, from the acquittal of the respondent by His Honour Judge Graburn on November 1, 1970 on three charges, prosecuted on

Cattanach, J:—These are appeals from the appellant’s assessments to income tax by the Minister for its 1964, 1965 and 1966 taxation years. The assessments were made following directions by the Minister dated August 16, 1968 pursuant to the provisions of subsection 138A(2) of the Income Tax Act that the following companies are deemed to be associated with each other in their 1965 and 1966 taxation years:

(1) Loewen Holdings Ltd

(2) C T Loewen & Sons (1957) Ltd

(3) Build-A-Home Co, Ltd