Precision Automotive Company Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2349, 72 DTC 1283 -- text

A J Frost:—This appeal is from an income tax reassessment dated March 3, 1970 (varying a previous reassessment dated September 19, 1968) wherein a tax of $15,507.50 was levied in respect of the appellant’s 1964 taxation year, and was heard at Toronto, Ontario on

Estate of Ewart C Atkinson v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2344, 72 DTC 1290 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—This appeal was heard on July 16, 1971 at Saint John, New Brunswick by the Tax Appeal Board as it was then constituted, and deals with an assessment dated May 8, 1970 in respect of income for the 1965 taxation year.

In reassessing the appellant for the said year the respondent acted on the following assumptions:

Marilou E Shirley v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2341, 72 DTC 1286 -- text

J O Weldon:—This appeal with respect to the appellant’s 1965, 1966 and 1967 taxation years was heard at London, Ontario on September 16, 1971 under the Tax Appeal Board as it was then constituted. The parties were represented by counsel as follows: J R Caskey, Esq for the appellant and R B Thomas, Esq for the Minister.

T K Sales LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2339, 72 DTC 1295 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—This appeal was heard at Victoria, Province of British Columbia on November 4, 1971 by the Tax Appeal Board as it was then constituted. The appellant is a company duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia. On January 31,

Dick Bohun and Peter Bohun v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2325, 72 DTC 1268 -- text

J O Weldon:—The three appeals of Dick Bohun and Peter Bohun with respect to their 1965 taxation years initiated by Notices of Appeal both dated November 25, 1970 and of Reynolds Construction Ltd (“Reynolds” — year end March 31) with respect to its 1966 and

Roman Corporation Limited; v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2321, 72 DTC 1280 -- text

J O Weldon:—The appeal of the present appellant Roman Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Third Roman” for reasons which will hereinafter be made clear) was heard at Toronto, Ontario on December 6, 7, 8 and 9 under the Tax Appeal Board as it

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS