WALSH, J.:—This appeal is from a notice of re-assessment of income for the taxation year 1959 dated May 27, 1964, whereby $68,255.10 was added to Donald F. Farris’s taxable income previously reported in respect of alleged income from the sale by Donald F.
WALSH, J.:—This appeal is from a notice of re-assessment of income for the taxation year 1959 dated May 27, 1964 whereby $68,255.10 was added to the appellant’s taxable income previously reported in respect of alleged income from the sale by the appellant
CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal from the appellant’s assessment to income tax under Part I of the Income Tax Act for her 1963 taxation year. By that assessment the Minister added to the net income of the appellant for her 1963
CATTANACH, J. :—These are appeals from assessments made by the Minister under Part I of the Income Tax Act in respect of the appellant’s 1965 and 1966 taxation years.
WALSH, J.:—This is an action to demand payment from defendant under the provisions of Sections 30 and 31 of the Excise Tax Act and Section 10 of the Old Age Security Act of the amount of $5,324.11 in
JACKETT, P.:—This is an appeal from an order of the Tax Appeal Board dated September 30, 1969, whereby the Board purported to amend a judgment delivered by the Board on September 24, 1963 so that the judgment, which had previously dismissed the
JACKETT, P.:—These are appeals from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dismissing appeals by the appellants from their assessments under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the 1964 taxation year. The sole question involved in each appeal is
SHEPPARD, D.J.:—The issue is whether the appellant, Anglo- B.C. Distributors Ltd. and North West Distributors Ltd. were associated companies within the Income Tax Act, Section 39(4) during the taxation years 1962, 1963 and 1964, and in particular
SHEPPARD, D.J.:—The issue is whether the respondent Edward H. Sproston under Section 11(1) (1)* [1] of the Income Tax Act is entitled to deduct from his taxable income for the years 1963 and 1964 the monthly payments
JACKETT, P.:—This is an appeal from the appellant’s reassessment under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the 1957 taxation year in which the only issue* [1] between the parties is the correct determination of the
