International Nickel Co. of Canada Ltd. v. MNR, 71 DTC 5332, [1971] CTC 604 (FCTD) -- text
CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the appellant from its assessment to income tax by the Minister for its 1965 taxation year.
CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the appellant from its assessment to income tax by the Minister for its 1965 taxation year.
Noël, J.:—The appeal is from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board, reported [1969] Tax A.B.C. 97, allowing in part an appeal by respondent against an assessment by the Minister under the Estate Tax Act, by which he levied a tax in
DUMOULIN, J.:—This appeal from the decision of the Tax Appeal Board, dated September 10, 1969, [1969] Tax A.B.C. 944, was heard and argued before the undersigned on May 31 of the current year, ultimate day of the erstwhile Exchequer Court’s legal existence
Kerr, J.:—This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax on net profits realized by the appellant in his 1966 and 1967 taxation years on the sale of lands in the Bassano area of Alberta hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘ McKenzie land ’ ’ and
WALSH, J.:—This action came on for hearing before me in Calgary at the same time as the case of William W. Siebens v. M.N.R. (p. 557) and the same evidence was made applicable to both cases.
WALSH, J.:—This action came on for hearing before me in Calgary at the same time as the case of William J. McKinley v. M.N.R. (p. 574), and it was agreed by the parties that the evidence heard should apply to both
WALSH, J :—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dated June 22, 1970 (reported [1970] Tax A.B.C. 742) allowing the appeal of En jay Chemical Co. Limited from an income tax assessment for its 1962 taxation year in which appellant
KERR, J :—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board, dated December 14, 1970 (reported [1970] Tax A.B.C. 1314) which dismissed an appeal against the appellant’s income tax assessment for 1968.
WALSH, J.:—This matter came on before me for hearing at Toronto on two motions which were heard together, one being a motion by respondent for an order quashing what he refers to as “the purported Notice of Appeal herein’’, and the other being an
CATTANACH, J.:—These are appeals by the appellant herein against its assessments to income tax for the taxation years 1964 and 1965.