GIBSON, J.:—In this appeal under the Income Tax Act the issue is whether or not certain payments made in 1964 to the appellant by a corporation known as Kellough Brothers Dairy Limited are subject to a withholding income tax of 15
JACKETT, P.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dismissing the appellant’s appeal from his assessment under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the 1961 taxation year.
JACKETT, P.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board allowing, in part, an appeal by the respondent from his assessment under the Income Tax Act for the 1961 and 1962 taxation
CATTANACH, J.:—These are appeals from assessments by the Minister under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, ¢. 148, wherein additional tax was levied against the appellant in respect of its 1961 to 1964 taxation years inclusive.
DUMOULIN, J.:—La compagnie appelante, Coté Boivin Auto (Jonquière) Limitée, allègue, au paragraphe 19 de l’exposé des faits, que: ‘‘Les cotisations additionnelles pour les années 1961, 1962, 1963 et 1964 sont erronées et illégales pour une somme de $26,018.72 . . .”.
Hall, J. (tous souscrivent) :—L’appelant en appelle du Jugement de la Cour de l’Exchiquier du Canada prononcé le septième jour de mars, 1966 par l’Honorable Juge Kearney maintenant l’appel de l’intimé, le Ministre du Revenu National, de la décision de la
DUMOULIN, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision rendered on June 18, 1965, by the Tax Appeal Board (38 Tax A.B.C. 346) affirming an assessment of $12,404,35 levied in respect of one Louis Reitman’s income for taxation year 1960.
JACKETT, P.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dismissing an appeal from the appellant’s assessment under the Income Tax Act for the 1960 taxation year.
Noël, J.:—This is an appeal from an assessment dated November 8, 1965, whereby the appellant was assessed for additional tax in the amount of $773.04 by reason of adding to his declared taxable income for the year 1963 the amount of $2,809, a portion of the loss incurred by him on the sale of his home in Sarnia, which amount had been reimbursed by DuPont of Canada Limited, his employer.
The appellant was transferred on January 16, 1961, from Sarnia, in the Province of Ontario, to the City of Montreal, in the Province of Quebec.
GIBSON, J.:—On the hearing of this appeal two issues were raised, namely: (1) the deductibility for income tax purposes of a payment made in September 1963 by the appellant in the sum of $103,500 to certain trustees purporting to be in respect to a
