The Chief Justice (orally for the Court):

1 Nous sommes tous d'opinion que le pourvoi est mal fondé et doit être rejeté avec dépens. Le pourvoi est rejeté avec dépens.

The Assistant Chairman:

1 This is the appeal of Cecil M Langille from an income tax assessment in respect of the 1972 taxation year which was heard in London, Ontario on September 29, 1975.

2 The issue, as I understand it, is that the appellant, having made no deduction from his income for premiums paid into a registered retirement savings plan, objects to being taxed on the return of his capital in the form of annuity payments.

The Assistant Chairman:

1 This is the appeal of Greensteel Industries Ltd from an income tax reassessment in respect of the appellant's 1970 taxation year.

2 By notice of reassessment dated September 12, 1972, the Minister of National Revenue disallowed in the appellant's 1970 taxation year an amount of $100 being that portion of what the appellant claims to be a deductible business loss of $52,107.30 and which the Minister assumes to be a capital loss.

Bowie T.C.J.:

Roland St-Onge:

1 This is an appeal from a reassessment dated June 26, 1973, wherein a tax was levied in respect of the 1972 taxation year.

Judge Flanigan (orally: November 22, 1974):

1 For the reasons given this day in the appeal of the Estate of John McGraw v. MNR it is ordered and adjudged that the appeal herein in respect of the 1971 taxation year be and the same is hereby allowed and the matter referred back to the respondent for reassessment accordingly.

Lucien Cardin, Q.C.:

McArthur T.C.J.:

1 These appeals are from reassessments for the 1992 and 1993 taxation years concerning the disallowance of rental losses sustained by the Appellant on a one bedroom condominium in Whistler, British Columbia. The losses were disallowed on the ground that he had no reasonable expectation of profit.

Gibson, J (orally):

1 This appeal is from reassessments for income tax for the 1970 and 1971 taxation years of the plaintiff.

The Assistant Chairman:

1 This is the appeal of Joseph Berman from an income tax assessment in respect of his 1967 taxation year. By agreement of counsel for both parties, the appeal of Joseph Berman was heard simultaneously and on common evidence with those of Mrs Ida Berman and Mrs Pearl Lighter.