Koop v. R., 99 DTC 707, [1999] 3 CTC 2084 (TCC) -- text
Bowman T . C.J.:
Trieste v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1125 [at at 3133], 2012 TCC 91, aff'd 2012 FCA 320 -- text
Bower v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1152 [at at 854], 2013 TCC 183 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Anonby v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1154 [at at 859], 2013 TCC 184 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Tokarski v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1138 [at at 3213], 2012 TCC 115 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Fietz v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1351 [at at 1965], 2011 TCC 493 -- text
GMAC Leaseco Corporation v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 1141 [at at 908], 2015 TCC 146 -- text
Miron and Frères Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, 55 DTC 1109, [1955] CTC 182, [1955] SCR 679 -- text
THe CHIEF JUSTICE (concurred in by Fauteux, J.) :—I am unable to agree that this case is governed by the decision of this Court in Johnston v. M.N.R., [1948] S.C.R. 486; [1948] C.T.C. 195. Here there was an appeal to the Income Tax Appeal Board, and, before the Board counsel for the appellant outlined facts to which counsel for the respondent agreed. As stated in the reasons for judgment in the Exchequer Court, when the appeal to it came on for hearing, ‘‘the facts not being disputed, no verbal evidence was heard’’.
Keeping v. Canada, 2001 DTC 5358, 2001 FCA 182 (FCA) -- text
Pages
