Transalta Corporation v. Canada, 2012 DTC 5040 [at at 6757], 2012 FCA 20 -- text
Paajanen v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1229 [at at 1333], 2011 TCC 310 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Mickleborough v. The Queen, 99 DTC 47, [1998] 4 CTC 2584 (TCC) -- text
Hamlyn T.C.J. .
These are appeals for the Appellant’s 1986 and 1987 taxation years.
In computing income for her 1986 taxation year, the Appellant deducted, inter alia, $100,000.00 in cumulative Canadian exploration expense ("CCEE") and $33,333.33 in mining exploration depletion allowance (“MEDA”).
In computing income for her 1987 taxation year, the Appellant deducted, inter alia, $87,638.28 in CCEE and $29,212.76 in MEDA.
Hafizy v. Canada (National Revenue), 2014 FCA 109, aff'g 2012 DTC 1093 [at 2943], 2012 TCC 56 -- text
Meager Creek Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen, 98 DTC 2073, [1998] 4 CTC 2090 (TCC) -- text
O’Connor T.C.J.:
This appeal was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on July 23 and July 24, 1998 pursuant to the General Procedure of this Court.
The issue is whether subsection 55(2) of the Income Tax Act (“Act’’) was applicable to dividends totalling $1.8 million paid by two wholly owned subsidiaries to their parent corporation in the 1991 fiscal year with the result that the dividends were to be treated as proceeds of disposition on a subsequent sale by the parent of one-third of the shares of the subsidiaries.