Pinard, J. [Translation]:—The Court must decide here on the merits of an objection by a third party to the seizure in execution made herein.

Walsh, DJ.:—Defendant moves to strike out plaintiff's statement of claim, together with a finding that the proceedings are " vexatious" within the meaning of section 67 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 379 and amendments thereto, and

Décary, J.A. (Mahoney and MacGuigan, JJ.A. concurring):—The applicant appealed to the Tax Court of Canada from a reassessment of his liability to tax made by the respondent. Prior to the hearing of the appeal, counsel for the

Muldoon, J.:—This appeal by way of trial de novo is taken by the plaintiff in consequence of a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada [85-1743-(IT)] rendered in August 1987. That judgment, in which the taxpayer's appeal was allowed, is

MacKay, J.:—In this action the plaintiff appeals a reassessment by the Minister for its 1980 taxation year, on the basis that the reassessment in question was made outside the time limit established for reassessments by subsection 152(4) of the

Mahoney, J.A. (Hugessen and MacGuigan, I].A., concurring):—

Walsh, J. [Orally]:—The appellant was invited to take the stand and testify under oath but preferred to argue the matter, what she believes to be the merits of her claim.

Pinard, J. [Translation]:—The plaintiff claims the amount of $16,590.76, including capital and interest, from the defendant plus additional interest on $16,590.76 to be calculated at the rate prescribed from time to time under subsections 161(1) and (11) of the

Strayer, J.:—

Walsh, D.J.:—Plaintiffs move for an order: