His Majesty the King v. Charles Bell, [1917-27] CTC 225 -- text
BECK, J.A.:—This is a stated case—stated by Sanders, Police Magistrate.
BECK, J.A.:—This is a stated case—stated by Sanders, Police Magistrate.
AUDETTE, J.:—This is an appeal, under the provisions of secs. 15 et seq of The Income War Tax Act, 1917, and amendments thereto, from the assessment, for the year ending 3lst December, 1920, of that part of
TRUEMAN, J.A.:—The Magistrate of the Provincial Police Court, though finding the accused in each case guilty for failing on October 25 and 26, 1923, to give information demanded by the Minister under sec. 8 of the Income War Tax Act,
O. Thompson, K.C., and Sandlands, for appellant.
Sir Malcolm Macnaghton, K.C., and T. Mathew, for respondent.
Durr, J.—The appellant company in 1920 sold its Thurlow Island timber limits at a price which was largely in advance of the moneys expended in acquiring them, part of which price was paid in 1920, part in 1921, and part, though not the whole of
Craig, K.C., for appellant.
C. Killam, for respondent.
AUDETTE, J.:—This is an appeal,—under the provisions of secs. 15 ef seq. of The Income War Tax Act, 1917, as more specifically amended by sec. 7 of 13-14 Geo. V, ch. 52,—from the assessment, for the year
IDINGTON, J.—This is an appeal by the said company from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissing an appeal from a special Court of Revision held at the city of Kaslo on the 30th of January, and following days, 1923.
Hamilton, K.C., for the appellant.
D. Donaghy, for the respondent.
Harris, C.J. (dissenting) :—The accused was charged before the stipendiary magistrate of the city of Halifax with failure on August 1 and 2, 1922, to make a return of his income for the year 1919 as required by sec. 8 of the Income War