G. M. BLACKSTOCK, K.C., Chairman — This is an appeal to the Alberta Assessment Commission by Construction Supply Company from the decision of the Court of Revision of improvement district No. 123, which confirmed the assessment of the following personal property

BOULANGER, J.—Par son action, signifiée le 7 octobre 1942. le demandeur réclame à la défenderesse une somme de $191.55, comme solde des taxes de vente que la défenderesse devrait percevoir et verser durant une certaine période de temps.

Judgment: Whereas the City of Montreal took action against the respondent to collect a so-called "‘business tax’’ imposed and levied in virtue of by-law 1642 of the City of Montreal, duly authorized by the City charter ;

TRUEMAN, J.A.—The city of Winnipeg, incorporated by ch. 7 of the statutes of Manitoba passed in the 37th year of the reign of Queen Victoria, was continued as a municipal corporation by The Winnipeg Charter, 1918, ch. 120, and

McPherson, C.J.K.B.—The above is an action by the plaintiff, a municipal corporation by virtue of The Winnipeg Charter, 1918, ch. 120, and amending Acts [now 1940, ch. 81]. The defendant is a rural municipality incorporated under the provisions

CAMPBELL, C.J.—The respondent was convicted before Stipendiary Magistrate Martin on a charge of making a false statement in delivering an income tax return (1942, T-1, General). The sentence imposed was $65 and costs, and the object of the Crown’s appeal is to

THORSON, J.—The issue in this appeal depends upon the construction of section 5(b) of the Income War Tax Act, R.S.C. 1927, chap. 97. In September, 1936, the appellant purchased property in the City of Toronto on which there was an

W. B. Scorr, K.C., P.M.—Each of the defendants is charged that he did on or before April 30, 1941, make, assent and acquiesce in the making of a false or deceptive statement in a. return filed by him for income tax for the year ending December

Farris, C.J.:—In this matter Graham was operating a logging operation in British Columbia in the year 1943, during which time he deducted from his employees an amount of approximately $1,700.00, but did not keep the money so deducted separate and apart from

RAND J.:—This is an information brought to recover sales taxes claimed in respect of a contract of sale between the respondent as seller and the Lake Sulphite Pulp Co. Ltd. as purchaser of an apparatus known as a pulp drying machine. The machine was