KERWIN J.—The sole point for determination raised by the parties to this litigation is whether the appellant, Canada China Clay, Limited, is liable to the respondent, the Treasurer of the Province of Ontario, for a tax and penalties under the provisions of

Martin C.J.S.—This is an appeal by way of stated case from a decision of the Saskatchewan Assessment Commission dated July 22, 1944, whereby the Commission held that the appellant had been validly assessed for business tax by the respondent. The case is

THORSON, J.—This is an appeal under the Income War Tax Act, R.S.C. 1927, chap. 97, from an assessment for the year 1940 and turns on the question whether the appellant was residing or ordinarily resident in Canada during such year.

G. M. BLACKSTOCK, K.C., Chairman — This is an appeal to the Alberta Assessment Commission by Construction Supply Company from the decision of the Court of Revision of improvement district No. 123, which confirmed the assessment of the following personal property

BOULANGER, J.—Par son action, signifiée le 7 octobre 1942. le demandeur réclame à la défenderesse une somme de $191.55, comme solde des taxes de vente que la défenderesse devrait percevoir et verser durant une certaine période de temps.

Judgment: Whereas the City of Montreal took action against the respondent to collect a so-called "‘business tax’’ imposed and levied in virtue of by-law 1642 of the City of Montreal, duly authorized by the City charter ;

TRUEMAN, J.A.—The city of Winnipeg, incorporated by ch. 7 of the statutes of Manitoba passed in the 37th year of the reign of Queen Victoria, was continued as a municipal corporation by The Winnipeg Charter, 1918, ch. 120, and

McPherson, C.J.K.B.—The above is an action by the plaintiff, a municipal corporation by virtue of The Winnipeg Charter, 1918, ch. 120, and amending Acts [now 1940, ch. 81]. The defendant is a rural municipality incorporated under the provisions

CAMPBELL, C.J.—The respondent was convicted before Stipendiary Magistrate Martin on a charge of making a false statement in delivering an income tax return (1942, T-1, General). The sentence imposed was $65 and costs, and the object of the Crown’s appeal is to

THORSON, J.—The issue in this appeal depends upon the construction of section 5(b) of the Income War Tax Act, R.S.C. 1927, chap. 97. In September, 1936, the appellant purchased property in the City of Toronto on which there was an