Wain-Town Gas and Oil Company Limited v. The Minister of National Revenue, [1950] CTC 355 -- text

ANGERS, J.:—This is an appeal by Wain-Town Gas & Oil Company Limited, a body corporate having its office at Vermillion, in the Province of Alberta, against the decision of the Minister of National Revenue affirming an assessment for income and excess

Joseph Henri Mailhot, Ein Sa Qualité De Membre De La Gendarmerie Royale À Cheval Du Canada, Dûment Autorisé Par Le Sous-Ministre Du Revenu National Du Canada Pour Et Au Nom De L’honorable Ministre Du Revenu National Du Canada, Plaignant-Appelant, v. Laurier Drouin, De La Cité De Québec, Accusé-Intimé., [1950] CTC 353 -- text

SEVIGNY, J.:—LA COUR ayant pris connaissance de l’avis d’appel et du dossier :

In Re Bowater’s Newfoundland Pulp and Paper Mills, Limited : Tax Exemptions Claimed Under Preconfederation Statutes of Newfoundland, [1950] CTC 277, [1949-1950] DTC 799 -- text

THE CHIEF J USTICE :—The following questions of law, touching the interpretation of the British North America Acts, 1867 to 1949, have been referred to the Supreme Court of Canada for hearing and consideration :

Charles McCarroll Smith and Phyllis G. Rudd v. Minister of National Revenue, [1950] CTC 247, [1949-1950] DTC 852 -- text

RINFRET, C.J.C.:—I would allow the appeal and reduce the valuation of the asset in question at $67,230, on the basis of the income being $9,000.00 per year. The appellants should have their costs here and below.

His Majesty the King v. Hieman Angel, Solomon Angel and Max Jerome Barzman, Carrying on Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Pacific Bedding Company, [1950] CTC 245 -- text

CAMERON, J.:—By agreement of Counsel this matter was heard at the same time as the case of The King v. Pacific Bedding Company Limited, [1950] C.T.C. 236. The facts in this case do not differ materially from those

His Majesty the King v. Pacific Bedding Company, Limited, [1950] CTC 236, [1949-1950] DTC 834 -- text

CAMERON, J.:—In this matter the plaintiff claims from the defendant company the sum of $1,366.70 said to be due and owing for sales tax under the provisions of section 86 of The Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1927, ¢. 179, and amendments

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS