Alfred Curzon Dobell v. The Minister of National Revenue, [1950] CTC 379 -- text
ANGERS, J.:—In his statement of reasons for appeal the appellant says:
ANGERS, J.:—In his statement of reasons for appeal the appellant says:
ANGERS, J.:—This is an appeal by Wain-Town Gas & Oil Company Limited, a body corporate having its office at Vermillion, in the Province of Alberta, against the decision of the Minister of National Revenue affirming an assessment for income and excess
SEVIGNY, J.:—LA COUR ayant pris connaissance de l’avis d’appel et du dossier :
CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board, dated March 22, 1950, 2 Tax A.B.C. 55 at p. 60, which Board unanimously allowed the respondent’s appeal from an assessment to
THE CHIEF J USTICE :—The following questions of law, touching the interpretation of the British North America Acts, 1867 to 1949, have been referred to the Supreme Court of Canada for hearing and consideration :
CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal from an assessment to income tax dated May 17, 1946, in respect of the taxation year 1944.
THORSON, P:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board dismissing the appellant’s appeal against his income tax assessment for the year 1946. The facts from which it rises are simple. The appellant is a barrister and solicitor
RINFRET, C.J.C.:—I would allow the appeal and reduce the valuation of the asset in question at $67,230, on the basis of the income being $9,000.00 per year. The appellants should have their costs here and below.
CAMERON, J.:—By agreement of Counsel this matter was heard at the same time as the case of The King v. Pacific Bedding Company Limited, [1950] C.T.C. 236. The facts in this case do not differ materially from those
CAMERON, J.:—In this matter the plaintiff claims from the defendant company the sum of $1,366.70 said to be due and owing for sales tax under the provisions of section 86 of The Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1927, ¢. 179, and amendments