Supermarché Ste-Croix Inc. v. R., [1996] 1 CTC 2506, 95 DTC 871 -- text
Lamarre Proulx J.T.C.C.: — The appellant instituted an appeal from the reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) for the 1988 taxation year.
Lamarre Proulx J.T.C.C.: — The appellant instituted an appeal from the reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) for the 1988 taxation year.
St-Onge J.T.C.C.: — The appeals of Ashifa Nanji were heard on common evidence on the 26th of September 1995 in the City of Vancouver, B.C. and it has to do with a disability tax credit sought to be deducted in her 1992 and
Teskey J.T.C.C.: — All these appeals were heard on common evidence. The appellants elected to have their appeals heard pursuant to the informal procedure.
Christie J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are governed by the Informal Procedure prescribed by section 18 and following sections of the Tax Court of Canada Act.
Rip J.T.C.C.: — The appellants Eric Detchon and Clifford Goodwin appeal income tax assessments for the 1985 and 1986 taxation years on the basis neither of them received a benefit in respect of employment pursuant to paragraph 6(l)(a) of the
McArthur J.T.C.C.: — This appeal was heard in Vancouver under the Informal Procedures of this Court with respect to the appellant’s 1992 taxation year.
Sarchuk J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal by John Edgar (Jack) Ashby (the appellant) with respect to an assessment of tax for the 1990 taxation year. In computing income for that year the appellant reported income and deductions from First Choice
P.R. Dussault J.T.C.C.:— These are appeals from assessments for the appellant’s 1984 to 1987 taxation years.
Rip J.T.C.C. — The main issue in these appeals [1] is whether a certain outlay is an expense incurred in the course of carrying on a business and is deductible in determining the appellants’ income from business for the
Rip J.T.C.C.:— The appellants Paul Vaccarello and Emilio Grimaldi appeal assessments for the 1987 and 1988 taxation years on the basis that: