Linden, J.A. (Mahoney, MacGuigan, JJ.A., concurring):— This is an application for judicial review of a decision of Judge Taylor of the Tax Court of Canada in which it was held that a monthly housing subsidy paid to the respondent in

Mahoney, J.A.:— This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Tax Court of Canada given in an appeal by the applicant from her 1990 and 1991 income tax assessments. Her income for the years in issue consisted entirely of

Marceau, J.A. (Desjardins and Létourneau, JJ.A., concurring):— This appeal is from a judgment of the Trial Division ([1991] 2 C.T.C. 214, 91 D.T.C. 5535), rendered pursuant to the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148

Hugessen, J.A. (Pratte, J.A., concurring):— This is an application for judicial review of a reported decision of the Tax Court of Canada ([1992] 2 C.T.C. 2497, 92 D.T.C. 2098) dismissing the applicant's appeal from her 1989 tax assessment.

Isaacs, C.J.:—In this section 28 application, the applicant has asked this Court to review and set aside a decision of the Tax Court pronounced under the informal procedure in subsection 18.15(4) of the Tax Court of Canada Act,

Platana, J.:—This is an application pursuant to section 232 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"), to determine whether certain documents seized from the offices of Walter C. Wieckowski, a

Stone, J.A.:— We have not been persuaded that any reviewable error has been made by the learned Tax Court judge in coming to his judgment of March 16, 1993, whereby the applicant’s appeal from an assessment to tax for the taxation year 1988

Lamarre J.T.C.C.:-This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax made by the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") with respect to the appellant’s 1992 taxation year. In assessing the appellant, the Minister included an amount of $27,500 received

McAarthur J.T.C.C.:—These appeals heard in Toronto, Ontario, are in respect of the appellant’s 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 and 1991 taxation years.

Bonner J.T.C.C.:—This case concerns the taxability of employees in respect of rewards under frequent flyer plans in cases where the rewards result from the redemption of frequent flyer points earned om business travel at the employer’s expense. As well there is an