James R. Chorney and Judith Anne Chorney v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2444, 95 DTC 124 -- text

O’Connor J.T.C.C.:—These appeals were heard on common evidence, pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court, in Edmonton, Alberta on August 30, 1994 and relate to the appellants’ 1989 taxation year.

Issue

The only issue in these appeals is whether the appellants’ total profit of $55,000 ($27,500 for each appellant), realized on a disposition of real estate in 1989 was on capital or income account.

Gerry Power v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2420 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Teskey J.T.C.C.:—The appellant elected to have these appeals from assessment of income tax for the years 1989 and 1990 heard pursuant to the Informal Procedure Rules.

Issue

The sole issue before me is the penalties imposed by the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") pursuant to subsection 163(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act") on unreported income for these two years.

Harvey A. McLachlin and Pearl-Anne Dick-McLachlin v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2410, [1993] 2 CTC 2712 -- text

O'Connor, T.C.C.J.:—These matters were heard together and on common evidence by consent of the parties in Ottawa, Ontario, on July 12, 1993. They are appeals pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court and concern the appellants' 1987,1988 and 1989

Bowens v. The Queen, 94 DTC 1853, [1994] 2 CTC 2404 (TCC), aff'd 96 DTC 6128 (FCA) -- text

Bowman J.T.C.C.:—This appeal is from an assessment for the appellant's 1983 taxation year. By that assessment the Minister of National Revenue included in the appellant's income $69,238 under subsection 245(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS