O’Connor J.T.C.C.:—This appeal was heard in Toronto, Ontario on May 9, 1994 pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court. The only issue in this case is whether the appellant in 1992 was entitled to a pension credit of $1,000 under subsection

Beaubier J.T.C.C.:—This matter was heard in Regina, Saskatchewan on June 28, 1994 pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court. The appellant was the only witness.

Christie A.C.J.T.C.C.:—This appeal is governed by the informal procedure prescribed by section 18 and following sections of the Tax Court of Canada Act. It relates to the appellant’s 1992 taxation year.

Beaubier J.T.C.C.:-This appeal was heard in Regina, Saskatchewan on May 9, 1994 pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court. The appellant was the only witness.

Bowman J.T.C.C.:—This is an appeal from an assessment for the 1990 taxation year. The issue concerns the inclusion by the Minister of National Revenue ("the Minister") of the sum of $6,344 in computing the appellant’s income from alimony pursuant to the

Kempo J.T.C.C. (orally):—This general procedure appeal concerns the appellant’s 1989 taxation year. Two main issues were advanced at the hearing.

Bowman J.T.C.C.:-This appeal is from an assessment for the 1987 taxation year. Mrs. Dawn Mongillo is represented by her husband. There were two years originally. On one was a deduction by her of a disability deduction of $2,890, and the other is a

O’Connor J.T.C.C.:—This matter was heard in Toronto, Ontario, on May 13, 1994. It is an appeal pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court concerning the appellant’s taxation years ending January 31, 1988 and January 31, 1989.

Bell J.T.C.C.:-This case was heard under the informal procedure of this Court.

The issue is whether the appellant is entitled, in her 1982 taxation year, to:

Kempo J.T.C.C.:-This general procedure appeal concerns the appellant’s 1986 taxation year.