Innovation and Development Partnership / Idp Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 2 CTC 88 -- text

Cullen, J.:—This is an application pursuant to Rule 355 (Federal Court Rules, C.R.C., c. 663) for a contempt of court order in respect of a show cause order requiring the plaintiff to attend before the Federal Court of Canada on May 19,1993

Lan v. Macdonald v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 2 CTC 75, 93 DTC 5318 -- text

Mahoney, J.A.:—This application for judicial review seeks to set aside a decision of the Tax Court which, on the respondent's motion, quashed the applicant's appeal against his 1988 income tax assessment on finding that the notice of appeal disclosed no arguable ground

Francois Fiore and Gino Fiore v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 2 CTC 68 -- text

Létourneau, J.A.:—The Court has before it two applications for judicial review made pursuant to sections 28 and 18.1 of the Federal Court Act[1] and brought against a Tax Court of Canada decision rendered orally in May 1992. That Court heard two appeals filed by the applicants from a notice of assessment sent to them by the Minister or National Revenue.

Russell Food Equipment and Cassidy Ltée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1993] 2 CTC 63 -- text

Pinard, J.:—This is an appeal under section 81.22 of the Excise Tax Act. R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15, as amended (the "Act"), which permits a person to appeal to this Court in respect of an assessment or determination by the Minister

Paramount Productions Inc. v. The Queen, 93 DTC 5285, [1993] 2 CTC 47 (FCTD) -- text

Reed, J.:—The issue in this case is whether the day of mailing of a notice of original assessment of the income tax payable by Paramount Pictures Corporation (Canada) Ltd. for the fiscal year ending July 31, 1980, occurred in 1981 or in 1984. If it

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS