MacGuigan, J.A.:— This is an appeal from a judgment of Martin, J. of October 11,1991, dismissing the appellant's appeal from income-tax reassessments for its 1977 to 1981 taxation years.

Mahoney, J.A.:— This is an appeal from a reported decision of the Trial Division ([1990] 2 C.T.C. 4, 90 D.T.C. 6335) arising out of a mistake made by the respondent in preparing his 1982 income tax return. The respondent elected to forward

MacKay, J.:—This is an appeal from a reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue, dated February 18, 1985, of the income tax return of the plaintiff corporation for its 1979 taxation year. Notice of objection to the reassessment was served on May 3, 1985.

Reed, J. (orally):— I am persuaded, in the circumstances of this case, that it is appropriate to stay the proceedings pending the final disposition of the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Jerome, A.C.J.:— This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada which dismissed his appeal from an assessment issued by the Minister of National Revenue on September 21, 1988.

Walsh, D.J.:— This action concerns a deduction sought by plaintiff in its 1984 tax year of a tax credit in the amount of $60,000 pursuant to the scientific research and experimental development tax credit program, for advances made by it to a

Décary, J.A.:— In February 1987, the applicant paid $6,500 into his wife’s registered retirement savings plan (RRSP). As he was authorized to do by subsection 146(5.1) of the Income Tax Act ("the Act"), he deducted this amount

Teitelbaum, J.:— On March 1, 1993, the plaintiff, Ruth Giagnocavo, filed in the Federal Court Registry in Toronto, Ontario, a notice of motion "for an order allowing appeal from associate senior prothonotary Giles’ order of February 15, 1993 to allow

Lefebvre, S.P.:—This Court orders that the plaintiff's appeal with respect to the 1980 taxation year be and is hereby allowed, without costs to either party, and that the reassessment for the plaintiff's 1980 taxation year be and is hereby referred back

Robertson, J.A.:—These two appeals arise from a decision of a learned trial judge wherein he dismissed the appellants' appeals with respect to certain notices of assessment issued by the Minister of National Revenue. Pursuant to those notices, the appellants