Francis Dunleavy v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 1 CTC 2648 -- text

Hamlyn, T.C.C.J.:—The appellant purchased a residential unit (the''unit") and in January of 1988 sold the unit and made a profit of $47,292 (the ” profit"). The appellant's 1988 tax return (the "return") did not reflect the profit. In reassessing the appellant's return, the Minister of National Revenue (the"Minister") included the profit in the appellant's income. In addition, the Minister levied penalties (the " penalties”) under subsection 163(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act")..

Jean Bouchard v. Minister of National Revenue, [1993] 1 CTC 2622, 93 DTC 1163 -- text

Lamarre Proulx, T.C.C.J.:—These are appeals from reassessments for 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983. These reassessments were made by the respondent using the net worth method. This method is used by the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") where bad

170635 Canada Ltée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1993] 1 CTC 2602, 93 DTC 1129 -- text

P.R. Dussault, T.C.C.J.:— This is an appeal from a reassessment for the appellant's 1985 taxation year. By that reassessment the Minister of National Revenue ("the Minister”) added to the appellant's income the value of its work in progress at the end of its 1984

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS