Risto Karlsson v. The Minister of National Revenue and/or Revenue Canada, [1991] 2 CTC 282, 91 DTC 5611 -- text

Rouleau, J.:—This motion came before me at Vancouver on September 9, 1991. The defendant is seeking to strike the plaintiff's statement of claim pursuant to Rule 419 of the Federal Court Rules. He argued that the notice of appeal

Her Majesty the Queen v. Aqua-Gem Investments Limited, [1991] 2 CTC 277, 91 DTC 5641 -- text

Rouleau, J.: —This motion by the defendant is for an order pursuant to Rule 336(5) of the Federal Court Rules reversing the decision of the Associate Senior Prothonotary dated September 30, 1991, wherein he refused to grant the defendant's motion

Plaza Pontiac Buick Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1991] 2 CTC 259, 91 DTC 5547 -- text

Jerome, A.C.J. [Orally]:—I indicated yesterday that I would deliver judgment in this matter and I am now prepared to do so. In my view, this appeal must be dismissed. There are three or four reasons. The first and foremost is that, in my

Rolls-Royce (Canada) Ltd. v. The Queen, 91 DTC 5579, [1991] 2 CTC 252 (FCTD), aff'd 93 (DTC) 5031 (FCA) -- text

Martin, J.:—The plaintiff, Rolls-Royce (Canada) Limited, is the corporation resulting from the merger of Rolls-Royce (Canada) Limited and Bristol Aero Industries (Mtl) Limited on June 16, 1979.

International Forest Products Limited and Westair Resources Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1991] 2 CTC 246 -- text

Reed, J. [Orally]: —1 do not think it necessary to review in any extensive way the facts in this case. Agreed statements of facts have been filed which speak for themselves. It suffices to note that it was agreed that Jet A-1 Fuel is: (a)

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS