Pratte, J.A.: — We do not need to hear you, Mr. Malette. In spite of Mr. Basman's able argument, we have not been persuaded that the learned judge below erred within the meaning of subsection 28(1) of the Federal Court

MacKay, J.: —This was an application by the Attorney General of Canada, on behalf of the Minister of National Revenue for an order permitting officers of the Department of National Revenue to inspect and obtain photocopies of certain exhibits which

Joyal, J.:—The plaintiffs are the executors of the estate of the late Sir Leonard C. Outerbridge and are appealing the reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the tax return of the deceased for the 1979 taxation year.

Muldoon, J.:—The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the Tax Review Board rendered on September 6, 1979, [1979] C.T.C. 2868, whereby his appeal from reassessment of income tax for the 1973 taxation year was dismissed. He is, and was at all

Le juge Noël: —La requérante en appelle des cotisations émises le 16 avril 1984 pour les années 1980 et 1981 sous les numéros 9001 et 9002; le 15 mai 1984 pour l’année 1982 sous le numéro 9003; le 4 octobre 1984 pour l'année

Le juge Pinard: —Il s'agit d'un appel, sous forme d’action, en vertu des paragraphes 172(1) et 175(3) de la Loi de l'impôt sur le revenu, Statuts du Canada de 1970-71-72, c. 63 et amendements, interjeté

Pratte, J.:—We are all of the opinion that Décary, J. ruled correctly in determining that the expenses in question were not deductible from the appellants' income as current expenses.

Cullen, J.: —

Collier, J.:—This is a motion by the plaintiff to compel the defendant to produce certain documents for which privilege is claimed.

Muldoon, J.:—These reasons apply to eight actions instituted in regard to income taxation, including the case at bar. The others are: