Shirley M. Driol v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2175, 89 DTC 122 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.: —The appellant, Shirley Driol, appeals an income tax assessment for 1985 in which the Minister of National Revenue, the respondent, did not permit her to deduct in computing income the amount of $26,045.22 paid by her to the

J. Stollar Construction Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2171 -- text

Bonner, T.C.J.: —This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the 1976 taxation year. The issue is whether the respondent assessed “with all due dispatch" as required by subsection 152(1) of the Income Tax Act (Act) and, if not, whether the failure to do so invalidates the assessment. That subsection read in part as follows:

in English

100 Main Street East Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2145, [1989] DTC 88 -- text

Brulé, T.C.J.: —This is an appeal from assessments of income tax against the appellant for its 1981 and 1982 taxation years. In 1981 the appellant claimed deductions amounting to $4,632,416 which were disallowed and as a result in 1982 a claim

Inland Development Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2141, 89 DTC 95 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.:— These are appeals heard in Calgary, Alberta, on July 4, 1988, and November 2, 1988, against income tax assessments for the years 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1980 in which the Minister of National Revenue had disallowed as deductions from

W. Grant Thompson v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2134, 89 DTC 66 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.:—Mr. Thompson appeals his income tax assessment from 1985 on the basis that in calculating net federal tax payable, the Refundable Quebec Abatement is deducted from the basic federal tax prior to computing the federal surtax in accordance with

Basil J. McAllister v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2127, 89 DTC 71 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.: —Basil J. McAllister, the appellant, appeals income tax assessments for 1983, 1984 and 1985 on the basis that in those years he carried on the business of farming and is therefore entitled to deduct losses to the extent permitted

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS