Martin, J.: —The plaintiff, Desrochers Development Corporation, appeals the October 11, 1983 reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue in which the gain made on a sale of property in Saskatoon was classified as income rather than as a capital

Rouleau, J.: —This is an appeal commenced by way of statement of claim from a decision of the Tax Review Board dated January 4, 1982, allowing the defendant's appeal of a notice of reassessment issued by the plaintiff on March 16,1979

Finlayson, J.A.: — This is an appeal from the judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Steele, sitting in Weekly Court, dated January 12, 1987, wherein he ordered Giuseppe Vettese to attend for cross-examination on affidavits sworn in support of four

Martin, J.:—The plaintiff, London Life Insurance Company, appeals the defendant's reassessment of July 28, 1980 in respect of its 1976 taxation year under which the defendant assessed the plaintiff for additional tax on the basis that the plaintiff was not

Teitelbaum, J.:—This is an application by the plaintiff, Pierre J. LeBel (LeBel) wherein the said LeBel requests an order of the Federal Court extending the time for filing of a Notice of Appeal from the Judgment of Mr. Justice Collier dated

Teitelbaum, J.:—The plaintiff, Canadian Pacific Limited, hereinafter referred to as C.P., appeals, by means of a direct action, a notice of reassessment for its 1977 and 1979 income taxation years.

Heald, J. (Mahoney, J. concurring): —This is an appeal from a decision of the Minister of National Revenue refusing the appellant's application for registration as a "registered charity” as that expression is defined in paragraph 110(8)(c)

Reed, J.:— The issue in this case is a narrow one: the proper characterization of certain losses incurred by the plaintiff with respect to shares held by him in trust for a partnership of which he is a member. The plaintiff contends the

Mahoney, J.:—This is an appeal from the refusal of the Trial Division to strike out the statement of claim herein on the grounds that the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the action, that it discloses no reasonable cause of action and

Galligan, J. [Orally]:—Argued together were two motions which were many branched attacks on the action instituted by the plaintiffs. At the conclusion of the argument by counsel for the plaintiffs I indicated that I did not have to hear counsel for