Cullen, J.:—The appellant has strongly held political views and seeks to head up a party and/or convince others of the correctness of these views. To this end she has spent some of her income, and now claims deductions for expenditures made. I

McNair, J. [ORALLY]:—This is the motion of the applicant, Bonnie E. Danielson, pursuant to subsection 225.2(2) of the Income Tax Act for the determination of the question whether a direction by the Minister to the taxpayer to pay

Mahoney, J.:—The respondent has commenced a number of actions against the appellant and a related Canadian company arising out of the fraudulent misrepresentation of the value of goods sold by the appellant to the Canadian company and imported from the

Muldoon, J.:—It will be noticed by anyone who sees the documents on the Court's file of these proceedings, that one of the references preceding the title of action (style of cause), as formulated by the applicant’s solicitors, announces: “AND IN THE

Pratte, J. (MacGuigan, J. concurring) [TRANSLATION]:—In each of these two cases Her Majesty is appealing from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing an appeal by one of the respondents from income tax assessments for the 1976, 1977

Teitelbaum, J.:—Plaintiff (Stromotich) is bringing a motion seeking an order directing the defendant to refund to him a business investment tax credit (B.I.T.C.) on scientific research as claimed by him on his income tax returns for the year 1983.

Joyal, J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff taxpayer from the Minister's reassessments of tax for the 1979 and 1980 taxation years whereby certain claimed reserves and inventory allowances were disallowed and added back into income.

McDermid, D.CJ.:—This is an appeal by Albert Matthys from a conviction registered in the Provincial Court (Criminal Division) at London on February 18, 1986. The appellant was convicted of two counts of tax evasion contrary to paragraph 239(1 )(d) of the

Tarnopolsky, J.A.:— The Attorney General of Canada seeks leave to appeal and if leave be granted appeals, pursuant to paragraph 771(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, on a question of law alone from the decision of the Honourable Judge

Reed, J.:—The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the Minister of National Revenue which restricted the farm losses the plaintiff can deduct from his income for the 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982 taxation years to $5,000 per year. For the years in