Frank L. Stromotich v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1986] 2 CTC 319, 86 DTC 6464 -- text

Teitelbaum, J.:—Plaintiff (Stromotich) is bringing a motion seeking an order directing the defendant to refund to him a business investment tax credit (B.I.T.C.) on scientific research as claimed by him on his income tax returns for the year 1983.

Burrard Yarrows Corp. v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6459, [1986] 2 CTC 313 (FCTD), aff'd sub nomine Versatile Pacific Shipyards Inc. v. The Queen, 88 DTC 6352 (FCA) -- text

Joyal, J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff taxpayer from the Minister's reassessments of tax for the 1979 and 1980 taxation years whereby certain claimed reserves and inventory allowances were disallowed and added back into income.

R. v. James; Dzagic v. R., 86 DTC 6432, [1986] 2 CTC 288 (Ont.C.A.), briefly aff'd 88 DTC 6273, [1988] 1 SCR 669 -- text

Tarnopolsky, J.A.:— The Attorney General of Canada seeks leave to appeal and if leave be granted appeals, pursuant to paragraph 771(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, on a question of law alone from the decision of the Honourable Judge

Gordon v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6426, [1986] 2 CTC 280 (FCTD), aff'd 89 DTC 5481 (FCA) -- text

Reed, J.:—The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the Minister of National Revenue which restricted the farm losses the plaintiff can deduct from his income for the 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982 taxation years to $5,000 per year. For the years in

Her Majesty the Queen v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [1986] 2 CTC 267, 86 DTC 6390 -- text

Urie, J.:—This is one of two appeals argued together in this Court and tried together, on agreed statements of facts, in the Trial Division. In the two actions Mr. Justice Muldoon rendered judgment after trial in the sum of $6,836.36 in favour

D. Morgan Firestone v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1986] 2 CTC 251, 86 DTC 6405 -- text

McNair J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the Minister's reassessments of tax for the 1969, 1970, 1971 and 1972 taxation years whereby certain claimed expenses were disallowed and added back into income. The expenses in question can be broadly

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS