Taylor, T.C.J.:—This is an appeal heard in Edmonton, Alberta, on May 13, 1986, against income tax assessments for the years 1981, 1982 and 1983, in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed certain amounts claimed under paragraphs 8(1 )(f), 8(1)(h),

Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—Mary S. Caplan (Caplan) appeals from a reassessment of income tax for her 1978 taxation year. In filing her return for that year Caplan did not report any amount on account of the disposition of property at 412 - 414 St. Paul

Brulé, T.C.J.:—[ORALLY]: This is an appeal against reassessments of income tax for the 1981, 1982 and 1983 taxation years in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed automobile expenses as deductions from income, being $2,565.29 in 1981, $1,299.42 in

Couture, C.J.T.C.:— This is an appeal against an assessment dated March 17, 1981 in respect of the taxation year 1979.

The appellant acted on his own behalf and his evidence disclosed the following facts:

Goetz, T.C.J.:—The appellant appeals arbitrary assessments for his 1975, 1976, 1977 and 1978 taxation years. The arbitrary assessments were necessary, says Revenue Canada, because the appellant failed to file his income tax returns for those years and a company

Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—This is an appeal from assessments by the Minister of National Revenue of the appellant’s income tax for his 1980 and 1981 taxation years. By these assessments and by his pleadings the respondent conceded that the appellant’s farming

Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—This is an appeal from a reassessment of income tax for the appellant’s 1979 taxation year. At issue is whether the respondent correctly determined the capital gain upon the disposition by Carl M. Allred (Allred) of certain shares of

Pratte, J.:—This section 28 application is directed against a decision of the respondent rejecting an application made by the applicant for the refund of an amount of sales tax allegedly paid by error during 1983. Its outcome depends on the

Mahoney, J.:—The appellant moves, pursuant to Rule 324, without appearance, to join to the present appeal an appeal in respect of reassessments made by the Minister of National Revenue in accordance with the judgment of the Trial Division which is subject of

McNair, J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff, pursuant to section 172 of the Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63, from a decision of the Tax Review Board dated May 21, 1982. The Board dismissed the plaintiff's appeal