Canvil LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1985] 2 CTC 2451, 85 DTC 699 -- text
Tremblay, TCJ:—This case was heard on December 13, 1984 in the City of Toronto, Ontario.
Tremblay, TCJ:—This case was heard on December 13, 1984 in the City of Toronto, Ontario.
Taylor, TCJ:—These are appeals heard on common evidence in Montreal, Quebec, on April 17, 1985, against income tax assessments, for the years 1978, 1979 and 1980 for Les Entreprises Savino Inc, (“Savino’’), and for the years 1978 and 1979 for Les
Tremblay, TCJ:—This appeal was heard in common evidence with the case of Mrs Iris Steinhoff in London, Ontario on September 27, 1984. They were taken under advisement on reception of the transcript on October 22, 1984.
Rip, TCJ:—In computing its income from a business for 1976 the appellant, Oriole Oil & Gas Ltd, ("Oriole") deducted the sum of $1 million paid to two employees purportedly in satisfaction of loss of office and also in consideration for releases
Tremblay, TCJ:—This case was heard on October 23, 1984 in the City of Montreal, Quebec, and was taken under advisement on November 28, 1984 on reception of the transcript.
Sarchuk, TCJ:—This is an appeal by the Executor of the Estate of Adam Koziej from an assessment by the Minister of National Revenue with respect to the 1979 taxation year. The relevant facts are not in dispute. Mr J W May (May) was
Bonner, TCJ [ORALLY]:—These are appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1979, 1980 and 1981 taxation years. The assessments were made on the basis that section 31 of the Income Tax Act applies to limit the deductibility
Taylor, TCJ:—These are appeals heard on common evidence at Toronto, Ontario on September 23, 1985, against income tax assessments, in which the Minister of National Revenue assessed as taxable income the proceeds from Registered Home Ownership
Taylor, TCJ: —This is an application for extension of time within which to file a notice of objection, which was heard in Toronto, Ontario on September 23, 1985. There were several technical points raised by the taxpayer and by counsel for
Goetz, TCJ:—This is an appeal by the appellant from an assessment of its 1980 income tax return by the Minister of National Revenue. The assessment involves the appreciation in value of certain hotel property owned by the appellant, the sale of