Ryan, J:—This is a reference by the Tariff Board to this Court under subsection 28(4) of the Federal Court Act, which provides:

Reed, J:—This is an action by the plaintiff contesting the Minister’s assessment of its taxable income for the 1972-1977 taxation years. Two aspects of the assessment are in dispute.

The Court:—The respondent’s motion to quash is granted and the section 28 application is accordingly quashed.

Mahoney, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division which vacated the reassessment of the respondent’s 1974 personal income tax return. The Minister of National Revenue had added $327,190.42 to the respondent’s income, being $293,700 damages

MacGuigan, J:—This is an application under section 28 of the Federal Court Act pursuant to subsection 44(7.3) of the Excise Tax Act to review and set aside the decision of the Minister of National Revenue on April

Walsh, J:—This is an appeal by the Crown seeking to restore the reassessment made for defendant’s 1974 taxation year respecting the treatment to be given on an aggregate amount of $1,509,699 costs expended or incurred by the defendant in respect of

Addy, J:—There is no dispute as to the facts in this case.

The Associate Chief Justice:—This motion for an order pursuant to Rule 419(l)(a) of the Federal Court Rules striking out the plaintiffs’ statement of claim or in the alternative, staying the action, came on for hearing before me at Toronto,

Rouleau, J:—Il s’agit d’un appel d’un jugement rendu par la Commission de Révision de l’impôt, [1983] CTC 2559; 83 DTC 501, le 3 décembre 1982, rejetant l’appel que le contribuable a logé suite aux avis de nouvelles cotisations d’impôt sur le

Strayer, J.

Facts

The plaintiff commenced this action to appeal reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue with respect to the taxation years 1972 to 1975 inclusive and to appeal against the disallowance of certain expenditures during 1970