Cip Inc. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2525, 86 DTC 1373 -- text

Bonner, T.C.J. [Orally]:—The appellant C.I.P. Inc. appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1979 and 1980 taxation years of its predecessor company, Pacific Forest Products Limited. The assessments were made on the basis that outlays of $28,963 in 1979

Eleanor B. Kushnir, Audrey N. Maclean, Peter L. Hartman, Ben Bauer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2514, 86 DTC 1381 -- text

Christie, A.C.J.T.C.:—These appeals were heard on common evidence. The issue in each case is whether, in computing his or her taxable income for the year or years under review, the appellant is entitled to deduct amounts expended for the care and

Ernest Koteles, Patricia J. Koteles v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2511, 86 DTC 1378 -- text

Couture, C.J.T.C.:—These appeals were heard together on common evidence. They involved the appellants’ 1981 taxation year and the deductibility of farm losses incurred during the said taxation year from their respective employment income.

Patrick W. Riddell, Sparkle Car Wash Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2500, 86 DTC 1374 -- text

Goetz, T.C.J.:— These are appeals by the above-named appellants ("Sparkle” or “the Company” and "Riddell" or "the appellant") relating to reassessments for their 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1980 taxation years. The appellant Sparkle sought to deduct from income certain

Arthur C. Pennington v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2497, 86 DTC 1371 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.:—This application for extension of time within which to file a notice of objection, with respect to the year 1981, was heard in Toronto, Ontario, on March 24, 1986. The notice of objection in dispute contained the following information:

John Bell Wilson v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2488, 86 DTC 1336 -- text

Christie, A.C. J.T.C.:—The appellant appeals to this Court regarding his 1978 to 1981 taxation years inclusive. In respect of each of these years he is regarded by the taxing authorities as being within the scope of subsection 31(1) of the

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS