Christie, CJ:—The first issue which arises is the application dated May 13, 1983, made pursuant to section 7 of the Tax Review Board Rules, which remain in force by operation of section 29 of the Tax Court

Tremblay, TCJ:—This case was heard in Winnipeg, Manitoba, on December 9, 1982.

Tremblay, TCJ:—This case was heard on January 14, 1983, at the City of Montreal, Quebec.

Rip, TCJ:—This is an appeal by Ethicon Sutures Ltd against a notice of reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue, the respondent, in respect of the Appellant’s 1978 taxation year. The question in appeal is whether certain gains in the amount

St-Onge, TCJ [ORALLY]:—The appeal of Cheryl L A Cassista came before me on July 21, 1983, at the City of Halifax, Nova Scotia, and it involves farming losses for the appellant’s 1977, 1978 and 1979 taxation years.

Bonner, TCJ:—This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the appellant’s 1981 taxation year. The sole issue is whether the appellant carried on in the year a “non-qualifying business’’, a term defined by paragraph 125(6)(f) of the

Goetz, TCJ:—This appeal was heard by me in Vancouver, British Columbia, on October 29, 1982 in my capacity as a member of the Tax Review Board but this judgment is being rendered in my present capacity as a judge of the Tax Court of

Taylor, TCJ:—This is an application in Toronto, Ontario, on September 19, 1983, for an extension of time within which to file notices of objection against assessments for the years 1977 and 1979. The assessments at issue were dated November 5, 1981;

Christie, CJ:—This is an application by Dr Robert Kidd made pursuant to section 167 of the Income Tax Act (“the Act’) to extend the time within which a notice of objection may be served on the Minister of National Revenue

Taylor, TCJ:—This is an application for an extension of time within which to institute an appeal against an income tax assessment notice. The application reads:

DATED: December 07, 1982.