Jerome, ACJ:—This action is brought by way of appeal from assessments made under the Income Tax Act, RSC 1952, c 148 (am SC 1970-71-72, c 63) for the plaintiff’s 1977 and 1978 taxation years, and came on for trial before

Dubé, J:—Il s’agit ici d’une opposition de la part de dame Pauline Drouin- Chouinard à la saisie-exécution d’un immeuble situé à Verdun, P Q.

Walsh, J:—The issue in the present case was whether the sum of $6,072,595 paid to the plaintiff in its 1974 taxation year and $725,221 paid in respect of costs in its 1975 taxation year, said amounts resulting from a judgment rendered in

Heald, J:—We are not persuaded that the learned trial judge committed any reversible error. The appeals are therefore dismissed. Since they were argued together, the respondent is entitled to a single set of costs.

Urie, J:—The Applicant in this section 28 application seeks to set aside the decision of the respondent that the applicant’s publication “Real Estate News” is not a “newspaper” within the meaning of section 3 of Part III to Schedule III of the

Jerome, ACJ:—These applications for orders extending the time fixed by section 172 of the Income Tax Act, SC 1970-71-72, c 63 as amended, institute appeals came on before me at Vancouver, on Monday, February 22, 1982. I ordered

Grant, DJ:—The plaintiff lives in the municipality of Rexdale. In the year 1958 he and his brother Nicola DiLorenzo entered into partnership under the name and style of Di Lorenzo Construction Company and thereafter carried on business together in such

Jerome, AC J:—This action is brought pursuant to the Income Tax Act section 172, by way of appeal from the decision of the Tax Review Board. At issue is the deduction made in each of the defendant’s taxation years 1971-

Mahoney, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board ([1979] CTC 2619; 79 DTC 540) which allowed the deduction of a $139,500 business loss by the defendant in his 1971 taxation year. The defendant abondoned his counterclaim at

Le Dain, J:—This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the Trial Division striking out the statement of claim and dismissing the action as against certain of the defendants other than the Crown on the ground that the Court