Charles N Gowen v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2188, 80 DTC 1176 -- text

Delmer E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, on December 6, 1979, against income tax assessments for the years 1974 and 1975. In these assessments, the Minister of National Revenue altered the appellant’s V-Day

Thomas G Smith v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2186, 80 DTC 1166 -- text

John B Goetz:—This is an appeal relating to the appellant’s 1976 taxation year whereby the Minister asserts that certain monies paid out to the appellant in the year 1976 under a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) were income to the

George Herbert Schuett v. Minister Ot National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2185, 80 DTC 1168 -- text

John B Goetz:—This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the 1977 taxation year. In computing Mr Schuett’s income for the year, the respondent included the sum of $26,267.76 paid to Mr Schuett by the Canada Life Assurance

Dorothy Mae Hughes v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2173, 80 DTC 1157 -- text

Delmer E Taylor:—These appeals against income tax assessments for the years 1974 and 1975 were heard in Vancouver, British Columbia, on December 5, 1979. In these assessments the Minister of National Revenue taxed profits realized by the appellant on

Ernest Abramovici v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2162, 80 DTC 1151 -- text

Roland St-Onge [TRANSLATION]:—The appeal of Mr Ernest Abramovici came before me on November 8, 1979 at the city of Montreal, Quebec. The issue was whether a sum of $1,730.94 received by the appellant from the Eastern Townships Regional School Board was

Wynndel Logging Co Ltd, Wynndel Lumber Sales Ltd, Hallmark Lumber Ltd, Celcrest Timber LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2141, 80 DTC 1125 -- text

The Assistant Chairman:—When the appeal by Wynndel Logging Co Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “Logging”) was called for hearing, counsel asked for an order that the evidence taken in this appeal be taken as the evidence in three other appeals,

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS