Hill v. R., [1997] 1 CTC 2477 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Teskey J.T.C.C.: — The Appellant elected, in her Notice of Appeal, wherein she appealed from her assessment of income tax for the years 1993 and 1994, the informal procedure.
Teskey J.T.C.C.: — The Appellant elected, in her Notice of Appeal, wherein she appealed from her assessment of income tax for the years 1993 and 1994, the informal procedure.
Beaubier J.T.C.C.: — This matter was heard at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan on October 21 and 22, 1996. The Appellant and her chartered accountant since the assessments in this matter, Audry Kawula, C.A. were the only witnesses. The Appellant has appealed
Mogan J.T.C.C.: — This is a motion by the Appellant for costs in connection with an application by the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) to add a third party to the appeal herein. The story begins with litigation in the
Sarchuk J.T.C.C.: - This is in the matter of Jane Hanson versus Her Majesty The Queen. The matter for determination in this appeal is whether the Appellant is vicariously liable under subsection 227.1(1) of the
McArthur J.T.C.C.: - These appeals are from reassessments for the Appellant’s 1987, 1988 and 1989 taxation years. The issue is the deductibility of $32,312.00 paid in each of the two years 1987 and 1988 by the Appellant to the Province of
Rip J.T.C.C.: — The primary issue in these appeals from income tax assessments for 1986 and 1987 taxation years is whether the Minister of National Revenue (“Minister{H3}”) properly included the non-taxable portion of capital gains from purported dispositions
Teskey J.T.C.C.: — The Appellant, in her Notice of Appeal, wherein she appealed her assessments of income tax for the years 1991, 1992 and 1993, elected the informal procedure.
Bowie J.T.C.C.: — Gilvesy Enterprises Inc. appeals from reassessments whereby the Minister of National Revenue (the Minister) reduced the amount of its claim for an allowable business investment loss (ABIL) in the 1987 taxation year, and included in its
Hugessen J.A.: — Section 15 of the Special Import Measures Act sets out the general rule for the calculation of “normal value”
McArthur J.T.C.C.: — This appeal is from the 1993 taxation year. Mrs. Emmons claims a disability tax credit under section 118.3 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”). No claim for a credit was made for 1991 or 1992 nor