Beaubier J.T.C.C.: — This matter was heard at Edmonton, Alberta on July 8 and 9, 1996 pursuant to the General Procedure. The Appellant called Ken Christiansen, who testified on behalf of the corporation; Ronald Harsma, the Appellant’s lawyer at the

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are from assessments for the 1991, 1992 and 1993 for Leslie Karpati and for 1992, 1993 for Kate Karpati. They involve the denial of losses sustained by Dr. and Mrs. Karpati on a property located at 120

Garon J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal from an assessment by the Minister of National Revenue for the 1991 taxation year. In that assessment, the Minister of National Revenue included in the appellant’s income the sum of $9,735, which the

Brulé J.T.C.C.: This is an appeal resulting from reassessments of the appellant’s 1992 and 1993 taxation years in which certain business losses were not allowed as personal deductions to the appellant.

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals, which were heard together on common evidence, concern the Minister of National Revenue’s refusal to allow the deduction of soft costs with respect to an investment in a multiple-unit residential building (MURB) in

Bonner J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the appellant’s 1990 taxation year. The issue is whether financial assistance given to the appellant by her employer to offset the increased income tax burden imposed

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are from assessments for 1991, 1992 and 1993. The 1993 taxation year is not properly before the court since no notice of objection was filed for that year.

Lamarre J.T.C.C.: — This case concerns, first, an appeal from an assessment of the appellant Ferme Jules Côté & Fils Inc. for the 1987 taxation year, and second, appeals by the informal procedure from assessments of the appellant Jules Côté

McArthur J.T.C.C.: — The Applicant applied for an order extending the time within which a Notice of Objection may be served with respect to a reassessment for his 1987 taxation year. An application under section 166.1 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) for an extension of time within which to serve on the Minister a Notice of Objection to the said assessment was received by the Minister on October 18, 1995.

McArthur J.T.C.C.: — This appeal was heard in Edmonton, Alberta under the Informal Procedure of this Court with respect to the Appellant’s 1992 taxation year.