Leslie Karpati v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2412 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are from assessments for the 1991, 1992 and 1993 for Leslie Karpati and for 1992, 1993 for Kate Karpati. They involve the denial of losses sustained by Dr. and Mrs. Karpati on a property located at 120

Normand Gilbert v. Her Majesty the Queen and Robert Côté v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2377, 97 DTC 619 -- text

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals, which were heard together on common evidence, concern the Minister of National Revenue’s refusal to allow the deduction of soft costs with respect to an investment in a multiple-unit residential building (MURB) in

Gernhart v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1672, [1996] 3 CTC 2369 (TCC), briefly aff'd 98 DTC 6026 (FCA), Docket: A-625-96 -- text

Bonner J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the appellant’s 1990 taxation year. The issue is whether financial assistance given to the appellant by her employer to offset the increased income tax burden imposed

Ferme Jules Côté & Fils Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen and Jules Côté v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2361 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Lamarre J.T.C.C.: — This case concerns, first, an appeal from an assessment of the appellant Ferme Jules Côté & Fils Inc. for the 1987 taxation year, and second, appeals by the informal procedure from assessments of the appellant Jules Côté

Richard Nicholas Dudar v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2354 -- text

McArthur J.T.C.C.: — The Applicant applied for an order extending the time within which a Notice of Objection may be served with respect to a reassessment for his 1987 taxation year. An application under section 166.1 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) for an extension of time within which to serve on the Minister a Notice of Objection to the said assessment was received by the Minister on October 18, 1995.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS