D E Taylor:—These are appeals heard on common evidence in the City of Montreal, Québec, against income tax assessments for the years 1972 to 1976 inclusive for Industrial Fasteners Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “industrial”) and for the years
M J Bonner:—These appeals were heard together on common evidence. Each appellant appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1972 and 1973 taxation years.
Roland St-Onge:—The appeals of Patricia A Murphy and Kenneth J Murphy, and their company, Murphy Hotel Enterprises Ltd, came before me on August 27 and 28, 1980, at the City of
Roland St-Onge:—The appeals of Mr Harold Stanton Hadley came before me on October 14 and 15,1980, at the City of Toronto, Ontario and the issue is whether the appellant is allowed to claim more than the $5000 limit under section 31 of the
John B Goetz:—This is an appeal by the appellant with respect to his 1976 taxation year wherein he sold certain farm land acquired by him in the year 1972, the profit from which sale he declared as a capital gain as opposed to
The Chairman [TRANSLATION]:—The appeals of Mr Reynald Plante and Mr Hubert Plante from income tax assessments for the 1976 and 1977 taxation years, with the principal point of the case being the same in both appeals, were by mutual consent heard at
Roland St-Onge:— The appeals of the company Immobiliare Canada Ltd came before me on November 12,1980, at the City of Montreal, Quebec, and the issue is whether the appellant is allowed to deduct a business loss in its 1972 and 1973
M J Bonner:—The appellant appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1974 to 1977 taxation years inclusive. The appeal for 1977 was aban- doned and will therefore be dismissed. The respondent, by his counsel, consented during the hearing of
Roland St-Onge [TRANSLATION]:—The appeal of Station Canada & Gulf Terminal Inc came before me on May 22, 1980 in Quebec City, Quebec.
M J Bonner:—In making the assessment for 1977 now under appeal the respondent allowed only $242 of a claimed deduction of $1,321.84 in respect of interest expense on a rental property (hereinafter called “House No 1’’) owned by the appellant.
